| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Epping, Sydney
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
Wed, 03 March 2004 03:11
 
|
 |
man I had a big panic when my car started doing that. Lives at "0" and goes to nearly 1/2 when driving or just over when cold. But it was unfounded.
It is just the sender unit screwed into the head getting a tired old diaphram or whatev + a bad connection with the wire to the guage in your dash. (i also had a look at the connection and my 'presssure' went up. If you are REALLY worried, just go to a workshop and get an oil pressure test, will take 5 minutes.
Even my replacement (2nd hand) pressure sender wasn't that much better than my completely stuffed one. I have no idea how much a new one costs.. but untill you know for SURE that your pressure is low don't panic.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
RWDboy 1986 ST162 - running, but prolly not for long
|
RWDboy | Mon, 26 January 2004 11:11 |
|
Re: Non-sleek ST162
|
SCO-77K | Tue, 27 January 2004 01:48 |
|
Re: Non-sleek ST162
|
RWDboy | Wed, 28 January 2004 01:44 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
RWDboy | Fri, 20 February 2004 04:31 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
RWDboy | Mon, 23 February 2004 13:19 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
charliechalk | Tue, 24 February 2004 11:58 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
RWDboy | Tue, 24 February 2004 12:02 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
charliechalk | Wed, 25 February 2004 05:20 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
stereomike | Mon, 01 March 2004 00:30 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
RWDboy | Mon, 01 March 2004 03:59 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
smt_007 | Mon, 01 March 2004 13:12 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
RWDboy | Mon, 01 March 2004 21:53 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
RobST162 | Wed, 03 March 2004 01:40 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
RWDboy | Wed, 03 March 2004 13:40 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
StuC | Wed, 03 March 2004 03:03 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
RobST162 | Wed, 03 March 2004 03:11 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
smashed_wombat | Sun, 04 April 2004 12:56 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
wiso | Wed, 03 March 2004 07:46 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
sik sx | Wed, 31 March 2004 13:22 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
RWDboy | Sun, 04 April 2004 23:51 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
RWDboy | Sun, 04 April 2004 23:56 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
RobST162 | Mon, 05 April 2004 01:22 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
wiso | Wed, 19 May 2004 01:36 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
sik sx | Tue, 06 April 2004 03:41 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever - I have proof
|
RWDboy | Tue, 06 April 2004 05:31 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever : Update 5S-GE project
|
RWDboy | Thu, 13 May 2004 10:04 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever : Update 5S-GE project
|
RWDboy | Sat, 15 May 2004 05:46 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever : Update 5S-GE project
|
TRD-ST162 | Sun, 16 May 2004 03:13 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever : Update 5S-GE project
|
RWDboy | Sun, 16 May 2004 08:30 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever : Update 5S-GE project
|
RobST162 | Mon, 17 May 2004 01:01 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever : Update 5S-GE project
|
RWDboy | Mon, 17 May 2004 01:25 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever : Update 5S-GE project
|
RWDboy | Wed, 19 May 2004 02:50 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever : Update 5S-GE project
|
RWDboy | Wed, 09 June 2004 14:05 |
|
Re: Worst ST162 ever : Update 5S-GE project
|
RobST162 | Wed, 09 June 2004 14:08 |
|
Re: Greatest ST162 Ever (err?)
|
RWDboy | Wed, 09 June 2004 14:16 |
|
Re: Greatest ST162 Ever (err?)
|
RobST162 | Wed, 09 June 2004 14:26 |
|
Re: Greatest ST162 Ever (err?)
|
wiso | Wed, 09 June 2004 15:04 |
|
Re: Greatest ST162 Ever (err?)
|
RWDboy | Wed, 09 June 2004 17:17 |
|
Re: Greatest ST162 Ever - (for sale)
|
RWDboy | Wed, 30 June 2004 06:23 |
|
Re: Greatest ST162 Ever - (for sale)
|
79rollaboy | Tue, 09 November 2004 07:08 |
|
Re: Greatest ST162 Ever - (for sale)
|
RWDboy | Tue, 09 November 2004 08:25 |
|
Re: RWDboy 1986 ST162 - running, but prolly not for long
|
RWDboy | Sun, 05 June 2005 09:31 |
