Author | Topic |
Location: Terrigal
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Seating question for TA22
|
Mon, 08 March 2004 05:23
|
|
Yeah S13 seats might have got a bagging in the magazine, but if they had of rated stock 1970's Celica seats I think they might have bagged them even more!
They are very firm which doesn't bother me at all, i'd prefer a bit more lower back support though.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
Seating question for TA22
|
T APLUS 22 | Sun, 07 March 2004 14:20 |
|
Re: Seating question for TA22
|
Grega | Sun, 07 March 2004 16:15 |
|
Re: Seating question for TA22
|
Fattony | Sun, 07 March 2004 17:15 |
|
Re: Seating question for TA22
|
TurboRA28 | Sun, 07 March 2004 22:32 |
|
Re: Seating question for TA22
|
T APLUS 22 | Mon, 08 March 2004 03:15 |
|
Re: Seating question for TA22
|
TurboRA28 | Mon, 08 March 2004 03:24 |
|
Re: Seating question for TA22
|
T APLUS 22 | Mon, 08 March 2004 03:34 |
|
Re: Seating question for TA22
|
levos1 | Mon, 08 March 2004 04:39 |
|
Re: Seating question for TA22
|
SeptemberSquallIndustries | Mon, 08 March 2004 04:43 |
|
Re: Seating question for TA22
|
boris | Mon, 08 March 2004 04:48 |
|
Re: Seating question for TA22
|
TurboRA28 | Mon, 08 March 2004 04:33 |
|
Re: Seating question for TA22
|
boris | Mon, 08 March 2004 04:51 |
|
Re: Seating question for TA22
|
TurboRA28 | Mon, 08 March 2004 05:23 |