| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Epping, Sydney
Registered:
April 2003
|
 Best Suspension for MKIII Supra (yet still low)
|
Wed, 17 March 2004 04:59
|
 |
well the supra my brother owns did not get a blue slip because it was deemed, "too low", so now we have to get new springs  x 1million
Now, I have read this thread
But I guess what we need to know is what is a good option regarding springs yet will be legal, low, but protect the shocks and car sufficiently. We already have koni yellows on board, but just have to switch the springs.
I know the trade-offs, my car used to be a grading tool for a while but we gotta drop some height for handling reasons as well as looks. 
Are kings super lows legal on a MK3? are they stupidly low anyway?
what about whiteline? I have seen some Jamex springs for sale but read some bad reports on them.
What is the legal height anyway?
thanks guys!  Rob
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Best Suspension for MKIII Supra (yet still low)
|
RobST162 | Wed, 17 March 2004 04:59 |
|
Re: Best Suspension for MKIII Supra (yet still low)
|
lumpy | Wed, 17 March 2004 05:09 |
|
Re: Best Suspension for MKIII Supra (yet still low)
|
RobST162 | Wed, 17 March 2004 05:15 |
|
Re: Best Suspension for MKIII Supra (yet still low)
|
turbokid | Wed, 17 March 2004 05:16 |
|
Re: Best Suspension for MKIII Supra (yet still low)
|
RobST162 | Wed, 17 March 2004 05:45 |
|
Re: Best Suspension for MKIII Supra (yet still low)
|
spans | Wed, 17 March 2004 06:11 |
|
Re: Best Suspension for MKIII Supra (yet still low)
|
RobST162 | Wed, 17 March 2004 06:21 |
|
Re: Best Suspension for MKIII Supra (yet still low)
|
lumpy | Wed, 17 March 2004 05:41 |
|
Re: Best Suspension for MKIII Supra (yet still low)
|
Stenno | Thu, 18 March 2004 02:13 |
|
Re: Best Suspension for MKIII Supra (yet still low)
|
upgradedsupra | Tue, 11 January 2005 09:13 |
