| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Oakleigh, Melbourne
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
Tue, 23 March 2004 06:12
 
|
 |
PEWEE: what do u mean what did i do for steering? steering is as per standard. and the box is a hybrid c4/c9. U dont put an old V8 into a celica for handling(thats what the sr20 one is for  ). Yes it is front heavy and without power steering it makes it a little bit harder to turn. Add the lock diff into the mix and u got one straight line car. But my girlfriend actually drives it most of the time(its hers) and she is only 5 foot nothing so i dont think any of you guys would have trouble with it. Its a definate cruiser with straight line cahuna's. Thats what V8's are for isn't it?
alex ta22: what are u trying to say?
I would post pics but they wont let me on here and i cant be assed getting someone else to host them. u can find some pics of the car here: http://groups.msn.com/CELICA73/hotties.msnw?Page=1
Blue One is the V8
White One is the SR20DET (obviously) 
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
alex_ta22 | Fri, 19 March 2004 06:01 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
Norbie | Fri, 19 March 2004 06:11 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
alex_ta22 | Fri, 19 March 2004 06:19 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
Norbie | Sat, 20 March 2004 00:25 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
SeptemberSquallIndustries | Fri, 19 March 2004 06:59 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
torque | Fri, 19 March 2004 09:00 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
alex_ta22 | Fri, 19 March 2004 09:26 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
TA-022 | Fri, 19 March 2004 10:51 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
KING_22 | Fri, 19 March 2004 13:42 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
peewee | Fri, 19 March 2004 13:56 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
torque | Fri, 19 March 2004 14:56 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
gmsta27 | Fri, 19 March 2004 20:13 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
grphil | Fri, 19 March 2004 22:12 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
alex_ta22 | Sat, 20 March 2004 10:09 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
ddeane | Sun, 21 March 2004 06:44 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
KING_22 | Tue, 23 March 2004 06:12 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
SeptemberSquallIndustries | Tue, 23 March 2004 06:57 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
KING_22 | Thu, 25 March 2004 05:33 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
peewee | Tue, 23 March 2004 08:04 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
Brenton_TA23 | Thu, 25 March 2004 05:50 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
KING_22 | Thu, 25 March 2004 05:57 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
SeptemberSquallIndustries | Thu, 25 March 2004 07:32 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
ta23 | Thu, 25 March 2004 07:47 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
mtsbirch | Sun, 28 March 2004 17:49 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
Disco Scoob | Mon, 29 March 2004 12:47 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
SeptemberSquallIndustries | Tue, 30 March 2004 05:35 |
|
Re: TA22 conversions? *new info, i promise*
|
Disco Scoob | Wed, 31 March 2004 07:17 |
| Current Time:
Sat Jul 26 00:13:20 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0053598880767822 seconds |
