| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
January 2003
|
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
Tue, 23 March 2004 14:33
 
|
 |
I believe XP Professional has just RAS access. Which can be downloaded and installed. And 13 or 17 less boot up reasons. E.g (Update vid card drivers) = reboot. Domains. And a whole heap of junk. Why bother with home anyway? Unless hard drive space is critical then go with professional. Its got alot better recovery options than home. Especially if u'r running with a basic network even. Same crap. Still most likely would be provided on a princo or some other cd 
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
XP Home vs XP Pro
|
Nark | Sun, 21 March 2004 22:17 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
Squid | Sun, 21 March 2004 22:35 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
Squid | Sun, 21 March 2004 22:36 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
Lambolica | Sun, 21 March 2004 22:41 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
lang | Sun, 21 March 2004 22:36 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
rob_RA40 | Sun, 21 March 2004 23:13 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
Nark | Sun, 21 March 2004 23:48 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
MR. 2 | Mon, 22 March 2004 03:17 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
Nark | Mon, 22 March 2004 03:56 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
ehendrikd | Mon, 22 March 2004 04:01 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
Nark | Mon, 22 March 2004 04:06 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
clubagreenie | Mon, 22 March 2004 09:53 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
toof | Tue, 23 March 2004 02:48 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
4AGE | Tue, 23 March 2004 14:33 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
jackel | Tue, 23 March 2004 17:27 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
commander | Wed, 24 March 2004 04:06 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
Arch | Sat, 27 March 2004 00:48 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
Nark | Sat, 27 March 2004 05:37 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
Zhyr | Sun, 28 March 2004 22:24 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
Ozzie | Sat, 27 March 2004 11:20 |
|
Re: XP Home vs XP Pro
|
SeptemberSquallIndustries | Sun, 28 March 2004 09:37 |
