Author | Topic |
Location: Perth
Registered: May 2003
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Fri, 02 April 2004 01:09
|
|
Allan wrote on Thu, 01 April 2004 22:44 |
I'd Prefer the 4m-e/5m-e fuel injection
|
Last time i checked my car was carbie
Allan wrote |
Thats almost the bigest load of crap I have ever heard!
I would much rather find the fastest smoothest way thru a corner then be stuffing around changing down gears trying to match the exit speed of the corner, I dont know maybe its the fact your yet to experence something with decent grunt, I know all too well about 4/5m's - you have time to open your can of coke and drink it between changes unless there SERIOUSLY modded, even then with such a flat torque/power curve its far from fussy about what RPM you pull out of a corner with.
Now you look at norbies case, a High powered turbo car thats driven dayly, im shure he could find something else beside a gearbox to spend $5000 on For 5000 you could get a auto for nothing rebuild it for about $1500ish (if it needed it *unlikely*) shift kit is about $300-400? that would leave about $3000 that he could get a motec for and then he can even set the points he wants the auto to shift at
|
So when your flying into a corner in your "auto" does it know when you want to change down to get the best speed out of the corner, even if you do shift down (which cant hurt the indestructable auto) you have to wait or open a can of coke before it shifts down.
i've checked out norbies car its a beast and i'll bet you my left nad he would prefer a manual to an auto
Allan wrote |
Hello 4m Vs high powered car again! a high powered car puts much more stress on a driveline for example GT's 2jz eats a 5M/7M-GE clutch like a cookie from subway, easly fixed with bigger/heavyer clutch/pressure plate if this was a dayly driver tho dave would end up walking funny with a strong left leg from the heavy clutch pedal
Now norbie can do the big clutch/R154 thing (or V160 if his bank manager likes the look of his ass) but again what will go next Thrust washer, Clutch.. will he need some fancy twin plate $$$$$$? does he want to have cramps in his leg from a clutch pedal so heavy it belongs in a truck? then are the sharp unloading/loading forces of a manual going to turn his F series diff into 7.5inchs of metal clunks? or half shaft into two halfs of a half shaft?
You should REALLY look at both sides of the coin before you comment Manual is the be all and end all of transmissions, if it was Formula 1, porsche, BMW, Toyota etc etc etc are all wrong and you should write them a letter telling them that.
Allan
|
We'll have to agree to disagree, i know id spend the extra to get the 6 spd with truck driver clutch but thats me. i have looked at both sides of the coin and last time i looked porsche,bmw and toyota have manual gearboxes there are to many forms of motorsports to list that use manual gear boxes (ie V8 Supercars) how boring would it be if they had autos once again thats just my opinion
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
Norbie | Mon, 29 March 2004 00:28 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
BlackSupra | Mon, 29 March 2004 00:35 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
gianttomato | Mon, 29 March 2004 00:36 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
ra23celica | Mon, 29 March 2004 01:54 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Norbie | Mon, 29 March 2004 01:51 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
lumpy | Mon, 29 March 2004 02:26 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
BlackSupra | Mon, 29 March 2004 02:39 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
gianttomato | Mon, 29 March 2004 03:17 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
CrUZsida | Mon, 29 March 2004 04:33 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 29 March 2004 05:09 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 29 March 2004 07:32 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Mr DOHC | Mon, 29 March 2004 07:45 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
JZK25 | Mon, 29 March 2004 08:25 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Norbie | Wed, 31 March 2004 01:53 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 29 March 2004 08:35 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
JZK25 | Mon, 29 March 2004 08:50 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
wastegate | Tue, 30 March 2004 07:45 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
lumpy | Tue, 30 March 2004 08:27 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Cyber-punk | Tue, 30 March 2004 09:25 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
lumpy | Wed, 31 March 2004 00:30 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
coronamark2 | Wed, 31 March 2004 01:59 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Norbie | Wed, 31 March 2004 03:58 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Allan | Wed, 31 March 2004 06:36 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
coronamark2 | Wed, 31 March 2004 06:52 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
V8_MA61 | Wed, 31 March 2004 12:11 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Allan | Wed, 31 March 2004 13:33 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
coronamark2 | Thu, 01 April 2004 00:56 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Allan | Thu, 01 April 2004 14:44 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
coronamark2 | Fri, 02 April 2004 01:09 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Norbie | Wed, 31 March 2004 23:45 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
lumpy | Thu, 01 April 2004 01:27 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
coronamark2 | Thu, 01 April 2004 01:32 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Stenno | Thu, 01 April 2004 02:47 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Norbie | Thu, 01 April 2004 04:15 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
rob_RA40 | Thu, 01 April 2004 04:37 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
lumpy | Thu, 01 April 2004 05:06 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
gianttomato | Thu, 01 April 2004 05:49 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Norbie | Thu, 01 April 2004 06:18 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
gianttomato | Thu, 01 April 2004 06:23 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
V8_MA61 | Thu, 01 April 2004 07:49 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Stenno | Thu, 01 April 2004 08:24 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
V8_MA61 | Thu, 01 April 2004 08:38 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Skip | Thu, 01 April 2004 09:50 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Stenno | Thu, 01 April 2004 21:09 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
spans | Fri, 02 April 2004 05:03 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Skip | Thu, 01 April 2004 23:49 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Celia-Sue | Fri, 02 April 2004 02:17 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Stenno | Fri, 02 April 2004 02:20 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Norbie | Fri, 02 April 2004 03:58 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
coronamark2 | Fri, 02 April 2004 04:02 |
|
Re: RIP: W57
|
Anthony Kellam | Sat, 03 April 2004 01:24 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
Norbie | Tue, 06 April 2004 14:26 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 06 April 2004 16:48 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
gianttomato | Tue, 06 April 2004 20:27 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
bbaacchhyy | Tue, 06 April 2004 22:01 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
Cyber-punk | Tue, 06 April 2004 23:03 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
CLG | Wed, 07 April 2004 02:34 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
Norbie | Wed, 07 April 2004 22:30 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
Cyber-punk | Thu, 08 April 2004 00:11 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
CLG | Thu, 08 April 2004 00:22 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
Cyber-punk | Thu, 08 April 2004 00:30 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
RWDboy | Wed, 07 April 2004 02:48 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
thechuckster | Wed, 07 April 2004 02:59 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
Stenno | Wed, 07 April 2004 05:29 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
Nark | Thu, 08 April 2004 00:11 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
onejayzed | Wed, 07 April 2004 06:50 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
Norbie | Thu, 08 April 2004 01:02 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
CLG | Thu, 08 April 2004 01:08 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
oldcorollas | Thu, 08 April 2004 04:35 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
Norbie | Thu, 08 April 2004 01:17 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
Nark | Thu, 08 April 2004 01:26 |
|
Re: RIP: W57 *** now with pics ***
|
KOFFEE-BLACK | Thu, 08 April 2004 01:38 |
Current Time:
Sat Sep 28 15:35:56 UTC 2024 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0055558681488037 seconds |