Author | Topic |

Location: Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan
Registered: January 2003
|
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
Tue, 06 April 2004 01:58

|
 |
onejayzed wrote on Mon, 05 April 2004 16:43 | how else do you expect to see +ve manifold pressure?
the maximum rpm limit for the toyota superchargers is 11,000rpm.
considering that the the s/c spins at around 7000rpm and produces 4.5psi on a short stroke 2.0L 6 cylinder, there is enough left in it to feed a 3.5L long stroke 6 cylinder at roughly the same boost if overdriven - maybe a shade more (like 6psi).
i plan to run one on my 1UZ on 4psi of boost with a calculated rotor speed of 10,500 rpm at 7000 rpm engine revs.
6psi of boost on a 3.5L six that revs to 5500? anyday...
|
so 11000rpm x 1.4L = 15,400Lpm
for 2L, 15400/2= 7700rpm MAX (for NO BOOST)
for 3.5L, 15400/3= 4400rpm (for NO BOOST)
for 4L, 15400/4 = 3850rpm... this is with ZERO boost!!!
to run 4psi on a 1UZ with 1 SC14...
4/14.7 = 0.272BAR.
4L x (1+0.272) = 5.09L effective capacity.
15400/5.09 = 3025...
so with 1UZ, and 1 SC14, you are limited to 3025rpm with 4psi boost, and above 3850rpm, the SC starts pulling vacuum!!
with 2 SC14's, (15400+15400)/5.09 = 6050rpm!!
so even with 2 SC14's you are still limited to 6050rpm, and 7700rpm before you start pulling vacuum!!!!
hmmmmmm.....
maths is a wonderful way of checking these 'claims'
Cya, Stewart
[Updated on: Tue, 06 April 2004 01:59]
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
boudan | Sat, 03 April 2004 15:00 |
 |
Re: toyota supercharger for a 3.5l engine
|
M.W.P. | Sat, 03 April 2004 16:14 |
 |
Re: toyota supercharger for a 3.5l engine
|
boudan | Sat, 03 April 2004 16:20 |
 |
Re: toyota supercharger for a 3.5l engine
|
thechuckster | Sun, 04 April 2004 02:14 |
 |
Re: toyota supercharger for a 3.5l engine
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 04 April 2004 03:45 |
 |
Re: toyota supercharger for a 3.5l engine
|
boudan | Sun, 04 April 2004 04:36 |
 |
Re: toyota supercharger for a 3.5l engine
|
gianttomato | Sun, 04 April 2004 08:11 |
 |
Re: toyota supercharger for a 3.5l engine
|
BlackSupra | Sun, 04 April 2004 11:18 |
 |
Re: toyota supercharger for a 3.5l engine
|
SeptemberSquallIndustries | Sun, 04 April 2004 11:26 |
 |
Re: toyota supercharger for a 3.5l engine
|
boris | Sun, 04 April 2004 11:27 |
 |
Re: toyota supercharger for a 3.5l engine
|
gianttomato | Sun, 04 April 2004 11:35 |
 |
Re: toyota supercharger for a 3.5l engine
|
Fattony | Sun, 04 April 2004 04:33 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
BlackSupra | Sun, 04 April 2004 11:36 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
boudan | Sun, 04 April 2004 14:47 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
gianttomato | Sun, 04 April 2004 21:22 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
onejayzed | Mon, 05 April 2004 01:23 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
Norbie | Mon, 05 April 2004 03:50 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
onejayzed | Mon, 05 April 2004 06:43 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
gianttomato | Mon, 05 April 2004 07:08 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
BlackSupra | Mon, 05 April 2004 07:31 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
boudan | Mon, 05 April 2004 11:00 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
Norbie | Tue, 06 April 2004 00:27 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
gianttomato | Tue, 06 April 2004 00:38 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
oldcorollas | Tue, 06 April 2004 01:58 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
BlackSupra | Mon, 05 April 2004 12:23 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
thechuckster | Mon, 05 April 2004 13:04 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
onejayzed | Tue, 06 April 2004 01:33 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
oldcorollas | Tue, 06 April 2004 02:06 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
onejayzed | Tue, 06 April 2004 03:01 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
gianttomato | Tue, 06 April 2004 04:11 |
 |
Re: Best N/A options for a 3.5L 6cy
|
Norbie | Tue, 06 April 2004 04:04 |
Current Time:
Sun Jul 27 18:01:38 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.031337022781372 seconds |