Author | Topic |
Location: Brisbane
Registered: November 2002
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
Sun, 11 April 2004 03:12
|
|
Quote: | Who said 7M, had no potential?
|
I don't think many people say that - I think you'll find people just bag it for the amount of money (comparitively) to achieve good, reliable results.
Quote: | and standard diff still hanging on? - Go the almighty G-series!
|
Don't quote me on this, but I believe this may be the one that shattered a diff on it's first drag meet a few years ago.
Quote: | all that grunt and only 12.48
|
Pay less attention to the ET and more atention to the MPH. Cars like that are notoriously hard to drive. On slicks it is hard to get the confidence to get right into it straight away, and without slicks it is hard to control the wheelspin. Either of these two scenarios, or even just a series of 'shakedown' passes, would explain a slow ET and huge MPH.
Quote: | Trap speed indicated hi 10's right??
|
Yep.
Quote: | 2JZ has a greater space between cylinder bores
|
Have you actually measured this yourself, or are you just guessing? I agree that the bore on the 7M is huge, but from memory the actual spacing of the bores is actually very similar on the 7M and 1JZ/2JZ engines.
Quote: | thats one niiice supra
|
I actually think it's one of the ugliest things I've ever seen. But hey, I drive a Corona
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
KOFFEE-BLACK | Mon, 29 March 2004 12:15 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 29 March 2004 14:03 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
STR8 2.8 | Mon, 29 March 2004 14:20 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 29 March 2004 22:16 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
lumpy | Mon, 29 March 2004 23:37 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
bbaacchhyy | Tue, 30 March 2004 02:00 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
Norbie | Tue, 30 March 2004 03:51 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
Clown | Tue, 30 March 2004 04:43 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
UUP-46X | Tue, 30 March 2004 00:25 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
draven | Tue, 30 March 2004 02:01 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
bbaacchhyy | Tue, 30 March 2004 02:13 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
KOFFEE-BLACK | Tue, 30 March 2004 06:02 |
|
very interesting............
|
MS-75 | Tue, 30 March 2004 06:19 |
|
Re: very interesting............
|
Norbie | Tue, 30 March 2004 06:58 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
coronamark2 | Tue, 30 March 2004 06:30 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
BlackSupra | Tue, 30 March 2004 07:06 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
torque | Tue, 30 March 2004 09:15 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
DOR-186 | Tue, 30 March 2004 09:36 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
twincam_ke20 | Tue, 30 March 2004 11:32 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
CussCuss | Thu, 01 April 2004 05:03 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
Caledwvech | Thu, 01 April 2004 05:08 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
lumpy | Thu, 01 April 2004 05:11 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 01 April 2004 05:50 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
coronamark2 | Thu, 01 April 2004 05:52 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
lumpy | Thu, 01 April 2004 06:34 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
Norbie | Thu, 01 April 2004 06:36 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
gianttomato | Thu, 01 April 2004 10:08 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
Allan | Sun, 04 April 2004 11:19 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
gianttomato | Sun, 04 April 2004 13:20 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
Allan | Sun, 04 April 2004 16:18 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
V8_MA61 | Sat, 03 April 2004 10:10 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
ed_ma61 | Sun, 04 April 2004 12:39 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
alwaysRA23 | Sun, 04 April 2004 13:46 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
nitephyre | Sat, 10 April 2004 00:03 |
|
Re: Who said 7M, had no potential??
|
7M-Brisbane | Sun, 11 April 2004 03:12 |
Current Time:
Sun Oct 6 13:40:45 UTC 2024 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0060579776763916 seconds |