| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan
Registered:
January 2003
|
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
Wed, 14 April 2004 12:01
 
|
 |
| dingaling wrote on Wed, 14 April 2004 21:46 |
That's interesting.
I checked out the 7mgte specs for my supra. As you may know it's a 3.0 litre engine (2954 cc's or there abouts)
and it's torque is 254ft-lbs.
Why isn't it more like 295ft-lbs? could it be becuase the engine is an older design and they weren't as effecient back then? (couldn't reach 100Nm/L)
|
the conversion from ft-lbs to Nm is
1ft-lb = 1.34Nm
254ft-lbs is 340Nm. what is stock boost?
guessing at around 80% efficiency, i'd be estimating that stock boost would be around 6-7psi?
how's that sit with the stock specs?
Cya, Stewart
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
no_tofu_speed | Wed, 14 April 2004 01:37 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
lang | Wed, 14 April 2004 02:36 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
Alainve | Wed, 14 April 2004 02:52 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
lang | Wed, 14 April 2004 02:56 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
no_tofu_speed | Wed, 14 April 2004 03:07 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
oldcorollas | Wed, 14 April 2004 03:07 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
oldcorollas | Wed, 14 April 2004 03:27 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
Lambolica | Wed, 14 April 2004 06:06 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
oldcorollas | Wed, 14 April 2004 06:31 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
Lambolica | Wed, 14 April 2004 07:25 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
oldcorollas | Wed, 14 April 2004 07:56 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
Fattony | Wed, 14 April 2004 08:00 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
oldcorollas | Wed, 14 April 2004 08:10 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
dingaling | Wed, 14 April 2004 11:46 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
oldcorollas | Wed, 14 April 2004 12:01 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
dingaling | Wed, 14 April 2004 12:10 |
|
Re: More capacity = more torque.... Engineering/sci reasoning?
|
shinybluesteel | Wed, 14 April 2004 12:45 |
