Author | Topic |
Location: Northwestern Sydney
Registered: August 2002
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Mon, 03 May 2004 07:29
|
|
Where I work, out of the 5 engineers here 4 of them have PhD's.
Excluding the director (years of experience).The rest studied straight through to get their PhD's and started work here.
I have no qualifications and yet these 3 engineers constantly come to me asking things that should be (I believe) assumed knowledge to an Engineer.
These guys tend to spend their time fine anilysing 1 column to find the most effecient size/reinforcement and its impact on the rest of the structure, then move onto the next. now if you were working for N.A.S.A that would be fine but in Structural engineering spending that sort of time on a project may lead to problems later and no profits off that job.
And most don't have a clue how a building is built and don't think of "buildability issues" when designing.
Geez I could go on......
After being in the industry I'd love to get out but that really isn't an option now, finacially. So I may well do my Engineering degree and start my own company doing speciallist jobs on the side.
But to answer the question I'm happy being underqualified (un)
But at the same time I'm young and I've reached the pinicle of where my current career can take me (in this industry) and I'll be stuffed if I'm doing this for the rest of my life.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 06:53 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:09 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
mick | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:13 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:29 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
BlackSupra | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:46 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:34 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
clubagreenie | Mon, 03 May 2004 10:54 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
peewee | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:33 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:53 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:15 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:52 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:28 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ae86drift | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:37 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:46 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:59 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
YelloRolla | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:28 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:44 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:01 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:57 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:55 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Tue, 04 May 2004 16:29 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:09 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Wed, 05 May 2004 03:54 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 06:15 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Thu, 06 May 2004 06:34 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Fri, 07 May 2004 02:01 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Sun, 09 May 2004 21:59 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:07 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:27 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:59 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:17 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:35 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:01 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Wed, 05 May 2004 13:38 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Caledwvech | Wed, 05 May 2004 04:51 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Wed, 05 May 2004 05:06 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Thu, 06 May 2004 22:40 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Cyber-punk | Mon, 10 May 2004 09:41 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:59 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
EvilJack | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:39 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
CrAiGzEE | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:42 |
Current Time:
Wed Feb 12 09:42:15 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.010655879974365 seconds |