| Author | Topic |
|---|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Epping, Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Mon, 03 May 2004 13:53
 
|
 |
bout as much as 5 years of psych and being a telstra support lackey 
I think the guy took 1 look at my 65wpm and got scared or something, as I'm pretty sure I left out my thesis (that seems to make people nervous)
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 06:53 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:09 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
mick | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:13 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:29 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
BlackSupra | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:46 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:34 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
clubagreenie | Mon, 03 May 2004 10:54 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
peewee | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:33 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:53 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:15 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:52 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:28 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ae86drift | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:37 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:46 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:59 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
YelloRolla | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:28 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:44 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:01 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:57 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:55 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Tue, 04 May 2004 16:29 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:09 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Wed, 05 May 2004 03:54 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 06:15 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Thu, 06 May 2004 06:34 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Fri, 07 May 2004 02:01 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Sun, 09 May 2004 21:59 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:07 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:27 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:59 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:17 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:35 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:01 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Wed, 05 May 2004 13:38 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Caledwvech | Wed, 05 May 2004 04:51 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Wed, 05 May 2004 05:06 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Thu, 06 May 2004 22:40 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Cyber-punk | Mon, 10 May 2004 09:41 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:59 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
EvilJack | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:39 |
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
CrAiGzEE | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:42 |
