Author | Topic |
![](images/custom_avatars/5)
Location: Cabramatta, NSW
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Tue, 04 May 2004 00:15
![Go to previous message Go to previous message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/up.gif)
|
![](blank.gif) |
That's a good idea Greg, just leave stuff out of your resume.
You don't *have* to tell them all your qualifications. Only the relevant ones required to get you the job.
FWIW, my woman (after finishing her degree (with the University Medal mind you)) wanted to become a clinical phsychologist. But that was years of Uni and more years of being paid bugger-all before she would qualify.
I advised her to just go out and make money, the rest can come later when she's financially stable enough to take years off to persue her passion.
She's never looked back.
You'll find a phsychology degree opens heaps of doors for you. She's in market research where her skills in research and in stats gives her a huge edge over others.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 06:53 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:09 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
mick | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:13 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:29 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
BlackSupra | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:46 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:34 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
clubagreenie | Mon, 03 May 2004 10:54 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
peewee | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:33 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:53 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:15 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:52 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:28 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ae86drift | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:37 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:46 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
YelloRolla | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:28 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:44 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:01 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:57 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:55 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Tue, 04 May 2004 16:29 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:09 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Wed, 05 May 2004 03:54 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 06:15 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Thu, 06 May 2004 06:34 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Fri, 07 May 2004 02:01 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Sun, 09 May 2004 21:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:07 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:27 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:17 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:35 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:01 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Wed, 05 May 2004 13:38 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Caledwvech | Wed, 05 May 2004 04:51 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Wed, 05 May 2004 05:06 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Thu, 06 May 2004 22:40 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Cyber-punk | Mon, 10 May 2004 09:41 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
EvilJack | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:39 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
CrAiGzEE | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:42 |
Current Time:
Wed Feb 12 10:05:26 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0076608657836914 seconds |