Author | Topic |

Location: Northwestern Sydney
Registered: August 2002
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Wed, 05 May 2004 02:09

|
 |
bbaacchhyy is 100% correct in the experience and qualifications are the best to have, but for the most part, experience isn't somthing that you can study and most employers look for 10+ years experience over a PhD (at least in my industry)
Personally I decided to go out into the workforce, learn, gain experience and then get my degree.
I did get accepted into Uni (not the one I wanted) but declined and did an apprenticship instead. Now 5 years down the track there are 2 of my mates who did do the course and degree that I was to do. but are on about 1/2 the money I am and I have 5 more years exp that they will never catch up on.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 06:53 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:09 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
mick | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:13 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:29 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
BlackSupra | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:46 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:34 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
clubagreenie | Mon, 03 May 2004 10:54 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
peewee | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:33 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:53 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:15 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:52 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:28 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ae86drift | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:37 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:46 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:59 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
YelloRolla | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:28 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:44 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:01 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:57 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:55 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Tue, 04 May 2004 16:29 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:09 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Wed, 05 May 2004 03:54 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 06:15 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Thu, 06 May 2004 06:34 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Fri, 07 May 2004 02:01 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Sun, 09 May 2004 21:59 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:07 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:27 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:59 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:17 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:35 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:01 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Wed, 05 May 2004 13:38 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Caledwvech | Wed, 05 May 2004 04:51 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Wed, 05 May 2004 05:06 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Thu, 06 May 2004 22:40 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Cyber-punk | Mon, 10 May 2004 09:41 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:59 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
EvilJack | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:39 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
CrAiGzEE | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:42 |
Current Time:
Fri Jul 18 12:26:58 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.025241851806641 seconds |