Author | Topic |

Location: Northwestern Sydney
Registered: August 2002
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Wed, 05 May 2004 06:15

|
 |
Squid wrote on Wed, 05 May 2004 13:54 | Yes engineers are fussy, but hey:
-If someone dies, the engineer is liable.
-If someone is injured, the engineer is liable.
-If something breaks, the engineer is liable.
-If something doesn't work, the engineer is liable.
-If something costs too much, the engineer is liable.
An engineer cant just take a guess that a minor change will not effect anything, cos if something goes wrong - not only can (s)he have their arse sued off, they could ruin their career, and worse have the concious of a death on their mind.
Yes you could design a structure to be more buildable and it may collapse (it has happened recently) someone may die, because a company was too tight arsed to put the proper efforts into construction.
|
Then why do engineers ask the draftsmen "should we put a column here"?
Sorry I'm having a s#%t day and the engineers aren't helping.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 06:53 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:09 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
mick | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:13 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:29 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
BlackSupra | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:46 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:34 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
clubagreenie | Mon, 03 May 2004 10:54 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
peewee | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:33 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:53 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:15 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:52 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:28 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ae86drift | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:37 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:46 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:59 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
YelloRolla | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:28 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:44 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:01 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:57 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:55 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Tue, 04 May 2004 16:29 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:09 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Wed, 05 May 2004 03:54 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 06:15 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Thu, 06 May 2004 06:34 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Fri, 07 May 2004 02:01 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Sun, 09 May 2004 21:59 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:07 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:27 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:59 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:17 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:35 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:01 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Wed, 05 May 2004 13:38 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Caledwvech | Wed, 05 May 2004 04:51 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Wed, 05 May 2004 05:06 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Thu, 06 May 2004 22:40 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Cyber-punk | Mon, 10 May 2004 09:41 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:59 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
EvilJack | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:39 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
CrAiGzEE | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:42 |
Current Time:
Fri Jul 18 08:58:15 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0046689510345459 seconds |