Author | Topic |

Location: Northwestern Sydney
Registered: August 2002
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Fri, 07 May 2004 02:01

|
 |
Squid wrote on Thu, 06 May 2004 16:34 |
Quote: |
Then why do engineers ask the draftsmen "should we put a column here"?
Sorry I'm having a s#%t day and the engineers aren't helping.
|
So an engineer thinks highly enough of you to stake his professional reputation on your opinion and you are insulted by this?
|
No... I'm really not insulted at all. But It really feels like these guy were just given their bit of paper.
I find it a concern that they can come up with a design, which comes across my desk and I pick it to pieces, reduce the amount of concrete, make the structure more effecient, easyier to construct and cheaper for the builder, give it back to the engineer to check and the find that it works better than theirs.
I mean these guys are supposed to supply me with information not the otherway around. And they are starting to rely on this type of communication. That is what concerns me, when an Engineer (on $120,000) asks a person with no (completed) study background (on $35,000)to setup a job lay reinforcement so they can check it.
There is somthing wrong with this industry and I want out...
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 06:53 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:09 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
mick | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:13 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:29 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
BlackSupra | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:46 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:34 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
clubagreenie | Mon, 03 May 2004 10:54 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
peewee | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:33 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:53 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:15 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:52 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:28 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ae86drift | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:37 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:46 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:59 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
YelloRolla | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:28 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:44 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:01 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:57 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:55 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Tue, 04 May 2004 16:29 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:09 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Wed, 05 May 2004 03:54 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 06:15 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Thu, 06 May 2004 06:34 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Fri, 07 May 2004 02:01 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Sun, 09 May 2004 21:59 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:07 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:27 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:59 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:17 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:35 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:01 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Wed, 05 May 2004 13:38 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Caledwvech | Wed, 05 May 2004 04:51 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Wed, 05 May 2004 05:06 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Thu, 06 May 2004 22:40 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Cyber-punk | Mon, 10 May 2004 09:41 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:59 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
EvilJack | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:39 |
 |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
CrAiGzEE | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:42 |
Current Time:
Fri Jul 18 05:36:53 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0057671070098877 seconds |