Author | Topic |
Location: Brisbane
Registered: November 2002
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
Sat, 08 May 2004 04:19
|
|
Hi guys,
Thank you for your suggestions. The reason I am not using the twin-single manifold I already had (and have since sold) is that, due to the placement of my steering, I am unable to run an exhaust. At all
While I am making a custom manifold, I am still operating on a budget. I'm sick of fucking around and am just after something simple that will provide a bit of a laugh. I already own the CT26, so this is the turbo that I will be using for now.
Additionally, I've had nothing but problems with cars in the past, so I just want something modest. I could get 600hp out of a 1JZ without so much as a problem, but it is neither a practical nor financially sound idea.
Think of it this way:
* My Supra ran consistent high 13's
* It was running a CT26
* It was bolted to a tractor engine
* The Supra was 1600kg
Now:
* I want the Mark II to run consistent high 13's
* It will be running the same turbocharger
* It will be bolted to a modern engine
* The Mark II is over 200kg lighter
Applying a bit of common sense suggests that I will most likely achieve my aims - possibly even before the turbo is hiflowed or I need to upgrade the injectors.
The only other thing I would consider is, instead of using a CT26, to purchase a 450hp Garrett GT28 (internally gated). Again, this would not use a 1JZ to it's full capabilities, but response should be awesome along with 400-450hp at top end.
These are about $2300 - if I sold the CT26 for $300 and put aside the $950ish for the hiflow, it would really only be an extra $1,000 for this upgrade (given that I'm already getting the custom manifold, exhaust, etc).
Again, budget comes into play.. is this $1,000 worth spending?
Leigh
[Updated on: Sat, 08 May 2004 04:21]
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
Turbo manifold design
|
7M-Brisbane | Thu, 06 May 2004 23:41 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
robs | Fri, 07 May 2004 00:41 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
YelloRolla | Fri, 07 May 2004 05:00 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
lumpy | Fri, 07 May 2004 05:37 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
YelloRolla | Fri, 07 May 2004 05:42 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
lumpy | Fri, 07 May 2004 06:32 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
YelloRolla | Fri, 07 May 2004 07:18 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
Grega | Fri, 07 May 2004 07:01 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
V8_MA61 | Fri, 07 May 2004 07:21 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
lumpy | Fri, 07 May 2004 13:31 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
7M-Brisbane | Sat, 08 May 2004 04:19 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
HKS_TRD | Sat, 08 May 2004 06:17 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
draven | Sat, 08 May 2004 07:48 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
BigWorm | Sat, 08 May 2004 08:45 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
draven | Sat, 08 May 2004 09:12 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
celicamad | Sat, 08 May 2004 10:49 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
gianttomato | Sun, 09 May 2004 05:15 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
quest | Sat, 08 May 2004 18:24 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
YelloRolla | Sat, 08 May 2004 23:50 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
7M-Brisbane | Sun, 09 May 2004 04:37 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
7M-Brisbane | Sun, 09 May 2004 06:19 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
gianttomato | Sun, 09 May 2004 06:58 |
|
Re: Turbo manifold design
|
7M-Brisbane | Sun, 09 May 2004 07:23 |
Current Time:
Tue Oct 22 22:23:55 UTC 2024 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0053510665893555 seconds |