Author | Topic |
![](images/custom_avatars/3701)
Location: Adelaide
Registered: September 2003
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Mon, 10 May 2004 06:59
![Go to previous message Go to previous message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/up.gif)
|
![](blank.gif) |
ohwhatafeeling wrote on Mon, 10 May 2004 16:07 | you've lost me bbaacchhyy (strange name, do you suffer from Parkinson's?), you're happy with your job & qualifications? Why did u create a thread venting your frustrations at being overlooked for jobs because of your qualifications? Have you forgotten the thrust of your original post or are you just on crack?
Hopefully your not one of those people who post rubbish just to get a rise out of others. In any event, your post is suspicious & I've reported it to the Toymods admin, just to be sure.
In my short time on this board I have already encountered several trolls & while fortunately I'm thick skinned, I am afraid other newcomers may be discouraged by the apparent lawlessness of this board.
I encourage toymods moderators to put forward a greater effort in weeding out trolls, Bbaacchhyy & his friends are not welcome around here.
|
Ummmmm, now I'm lost. Really lost. Draven started the thread, not me. Maybe you need to read from the top and follow what I'm saying very carefully.
I have not criticised anyone, and as far as me not being welcome, who has accused who of being on drugs and having a terminal disease ? Who needs to be reported ? And who's the newcomer ?
Think before typing next time, schmuck.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 06:53 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:09 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
mick | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:13 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:29 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
BlackSupra | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:46 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:34 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
clubagreenie | Mon, 03 May 2004 10:54 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
peewee | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:33 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:53 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:15 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:52 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:28 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ae86drift | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:37 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:46 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
YelloRolla | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:28 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:44 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:01 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:57 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:55 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Tue, 04 May 2004 16:29 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:09 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Wed, 05 May 2004 03:54 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 06:15 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Thu, 06 May 2004 06:34 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Fri, 07 May 2004 02:01 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Sun, 09 May 2004 21:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:07 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:27 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:17 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:35 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:01 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Wed, 05 May 2004 13:38 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Caledwvech | Wed, 05 May 2004 04:51 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Wed, 05 May 2004 05:06 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Thu, 06 May 2004 22:40 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Cyber-punk | Mon, 10 May 2004 09:41 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
EvilJack | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:39 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
CrAiGzEE | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:42 |
Current Time:
Wed Feb 12 10:05:16 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0052440166473389 seconds |