Author | Topic |
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Registered: February 2003
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Mon, 10 May 2004 09:41
![Go to previous message Go to previous message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/up.gif)
|
![](blank.gif) |
i think it depends where you want to go
on a whole though i'd say a balance would need to be acheived.
I'm seriously considering continueing studying part time when i'm fully trade qualified because i dont think i'd like to turn into one of the tradesmen i work with(65, about to retire, and earns less than a 17 year old roofer but has 50 years more experience)
going back to that roofer(a mate of mine) example again, he's 17, been out of school for 2 years and is on $25 an hour. Its not glorious work but it pays more than other people i know(uni graduates) who've been out of uni for 5 years. Thats not always the case though, a friends sister is working in the UK for about 60k pounds a year and she's only just finished uni(damn accountants ) with her masters in something(business i'd say)
as i change my mind often i think this might change, but my current plan is to get trade qualified and keep learning on the side.
oh and draven, i've been knocked back from a job because of my typing speed,70wpm and 95% accuracy, not the best accuracy but still i was told i didnt get the job because "my skills where not suitable for a call centre" and this is with 12 months(2 different jobs) telemarketing experience. well i believe it was this as the person interviewing looked rather surprised when she told me my results from that test. the job actually went to someone i was going to tafe with at the time and i found out from him that he was stoned when he turned up and barely finished the typing test...go figure
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 06:53 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:09 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
mick | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:13 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:29 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
BlackSupra | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:46 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:34 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
clubagreenie | Mon, 03 May 2004 10:54 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
peewee | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:33 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:53 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:15 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:52 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:28 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ae86drift | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:37 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:46 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
YelloRolla | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:28 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:44 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:01 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:57 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:55 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Tue, 04 May 2004 16:29 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:09 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Wed, 05 May 2004 03:54 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 06:15 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Thu, 06 May 2004 06:34 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Fri, 07 May 2004 02:01 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Sun, 09 May 2004 21:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:07 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:27 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:17 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:35 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:01 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Wed, 05 May 2004 13:38 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Caledwvech | Wed, 05 May 2004 04:51 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Wed, 05 May 2004 05:06 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Thu, 06 May 2004 22:40 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Cyber-punk | Mon, 10 May 2004 09:41 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
EvilJack | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:39 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
CrAiGzEE | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:42 |
Current Time:
Wed Feb 12 09:55:04 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0072081089019775 seconds |