Author | Topic |
![](images/custom_avatars/3701)
Location: Adelaide
Registered: September 2003
|
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Mon, 10 May 2004 23:35
![Go to previous message Go to previous message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/up.gif)
|
![](blank.gif) |
ohwhatafeeling wrote on Mon, 10 May 2004 16:07 | you've lost me bbaacchhyy (strange name, do you suffer from Parkinson's?)
|
the titel I use is my choice, and was not in use by others. You started this personal attack.
ohwhatafeeling wrote on Mon, 10 May 2004 16:07 | Have you forgotten the thrust of your original post or are you just on crack?
|
I didn't start the thread. Reread my original post CAREFULLY, and you'll see that I gave nothing but advice. I am very happy with my job thankyou, and my qualifications and pay, and I am proud of the hard yards that I put in getting here.
ohwhatafeeling wrote on Mon, 10 May 2004 16:07 | I encourage toymods moderators to put forward a greater effort in weeding out trolls, Bbaacchhyy & his friends are not welcome around here.
|
I don't have any friends ...
And yet another personal insult.
ohwhatafeeling wrote on Tue, 11 May 2004 09:17 | I come here in a spirit of brotherhood seeking fellow Toyota enthusiasts to chat with about our favorite hobby. I DID NOT come here to be attacked and trolled by a troublemaking, obviously sad & socially inept 37 year old.
|
At least you can add up. Yet even more personal attacks
ohwhatafeeling wrote on Tue, 11 May 2004 09:17 | I will however require an apology. The condescending & insulting nature of your post was uncalled for and very low class indeed. Doesn't have to be long just state you apologize and that you will never frequent this board again.
As for any non-trolls who wish to contribute to this thread, please continue.
|
Talk about dreaming... . The newcomer (only 6 posts) wants an apology and me to leave
[Updated on: Mon, 10 May 2004 23:38]
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 06:53 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:09 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
mick | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:13 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:29 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
BlackSupra | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:46 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:34 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
clubagreenie | Mon, 03 May 2004 10:54 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
peewee | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:33 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:53 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:15 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:52 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:28 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ae86drift | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:37 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:46 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
gianttomato | Mon, 03 May 2004 08:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
YelloRolla | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:28 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Mon, 03 May 2004 07:44 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:01 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 03 May 2004 09:57 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
lumpy | Tue, 04 May 2004 00:55 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Tue, 04 May 2004 16:29 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:09 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Wed, 05 May 2004 03:54 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Wed, 05 May 2004 06:15 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Squid | Thu, 06 May 2004 06:34 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Fri, 07 May 2004 02:01 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Sun, 09 May 2004 21:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:07 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Lambolica | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:27 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 06:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:17 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:35 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
draven | Wed, 05 May 2004 02:01 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
bbaacchhyy | Wed, 05 May 2004 13:38 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Caledwvech | Wed, 05 May 2004 04:51 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Nark | Wed, 05 May 2004 05:06 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
ohwhatafeeling | Thu, 06 May 2004 22:40 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
Cyber-punk | Mon, 10 May 2004 09:41 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 10 May 2004 23:59 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
EvilJack | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:39 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: overqualified vs underqualified
|
CrAiGzEE | Tue, 11 May 2004 00:42 |
Current Time:
Wed Feb 12 09:58:43 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.012671947479248 seconds |