| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
sunny coast, qld
Registered:
October 2002
|
|
Re: 2jz
|
Tue, 01 June 2004 08:13
 
|
 |
| gianttomato wrote on Tue, 01 June 2004 09:05 |
It would cope with anything you threw at it.
|
If I were to do this, the car will be tunring into an all out drag car so do you think your statement would still apply?
| Quote: |
One option might be to buy a 2JZ 'bitsa' motor, fit it with 2JZGTE pistons and then your 1JZ head and plastic turbos (making a 1.5JZ). Altenatively you could decompress it using a thicker head gasket. I think Manny has built a 1.5JZ - why don't you chat to him.
|
So aside from the compression that the different pistons make are they comparable in strenght ie. if you used a thicker head gasket to decompress it would the NA-T engine be as strong as a GTE?
| Quote: |
By the way, there is nothing magical about the 1JZ head - it just allows you to keep your 1JZ turbos. I couldn't help but flow test both heads and do some porting to bring the 1JZ head up to 2JZ spec.
|
The only reason I would be using a 1jz head is if my bottom end is stuffed and the head is still good and I may have found a cheap 2jz-ge short block. So you have actually flow tested the 2 heads? I think many people would be very interested in knowing the results
| Quote: |
Conversely you could decompress your 2JZ using a 2 or 3mm head gasket (readily available from the States) and fit a real turbo on a custom manifold. This is clearly a more expensive option.
|
As the car would be an all out drag car, this is the option that I would be doing. I don't think the CT12a's would be ANYWHERE near enough for a drag car 
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
2jz
|
CrispyFries | Fri, 01 August 2003 05:00 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
Simon-AE86 | Fri, 01 August 2003 05:51 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
gianttomato | Fri, 01 August 2003 08:13 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
Chris Davey | Mon, 31 May 2004 22:08 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
gianttomato | Mon, 31 May 2004 23:05 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 01 June 2004 08:13 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
gianttomato | Tue, 01 June 2004 08:35 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 01 June 2004 09:24 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 01 June 2004 09:43 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
gianttomato | Tue, 01 June 2004 10:02 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 01 June 2004 10:11 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
gianttomato | Tue, 01 June 2004 10:22 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 01 June 2004 10:25 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
gianttomato | Tue, 01 June 2004 10:41 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
Manny | Tue, 01 June 2004 11:21 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
gianttomato | Wed, 02 June 2004 10:07 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 03 June 2004 03:31 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 03 June 2004 03:38 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 03 June 2004 03:35 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 03 June 2004 03:36 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 03 June 2004 03:39 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
gianttomato | Thu, 03 June 2004 06:42 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 03 June 2004 07:50 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
gianttomato | Thu, 03 June 2004 09:41 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
Manny | Thu, 03 June 2004 10:39 |
|
Re: 2jz
|
gianttomato | Thu, 03 June 2004 10:49 |
| Current Time:
Mon Jul 28 18:13:03 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.005789041519165 seconds |
