Author | Topic |
Location: Perth
Registered: June 2002
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Mon, 07 June 2004 23:29
|
|
A starter motor will draw 150-200 amps easy, but only till the motor gets up to speed, for a second or two at the most.
The theoretical load limit of 60A is a continuous load limit. All electrical motors will draw 500-700% their CONTINUOUS rated current, and a starter motor is exactly that, a motor.
If you were to start your car and keep the starter motor turning, (provided the car didnt start) the current draw would spike for an instant and then flatline out at a much more realistic value (ie. around odd 40 Amps)
I believe car companies use small wire to keep costs down. It would be adviseable to use cable that is as large as possible to the starter, especially if the battery is in the boot. And if the battery is in the boot, run a positive and a negative to the battery, dont just earth the battery in the boot and use the chassis as a return, this is a no-no.
The HRC fuses are a good idea, put the fuse as close to the power source as possible. There is a place over here in WA called Alanco that sells automotive (12V) HRC fuses.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
battery relocation
|
EVOSTi | Sun, 06 June 2004 13:12 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cool1 | Sun, 06 June 2004 13:15 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Simon-AE86 | Sun, 06 June 2004 13:19 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
takai | Sun, 06 June 2004 23:17 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Sigmeister | Mon, 07 June 2004 03:41 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
shinybluesteel | Mon, 07 June 2004 04:04 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cool1 | Mon, 07 June 2004 05:34 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Sigmeister | Mon, 07 June 2004 05:56 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cool1 | Mon, 07 June 2004 07:55 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
EVOSTi | Mon, 07 June 2004 11:03 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cool1 | Mon, 07 June 2004 11:10 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
EVOSTi | Mon, 07 June 2004 11:21 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cool1 | Mon, 07 June 2004 11:29 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cyber-punk | Mon, 07 June 2004 20:51 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cool1 | Mon, 07 June 2004 21:12 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cyber-punk | Tue, 08 June 2004 06:14 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
takai | Mon, 07 June 2004 22:39 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cool1 | Mon, 07 June 2004 22:55 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
takai | Mon, 07 June 2004 23:02 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
gabe | Mon, 07 June 2004 23:29 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Norbie | Tue, 08 June 2004 00:00 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
improvedae86 | Tue, 08 June 2004 00:20 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
gabe | Tue, 08 June 2004 00:22 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cool1 | Mon, 07 June 2004 23:27 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
takai | Mon, 07 June 2004 23:32 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
gabe | Tue, 08 June 2004 00:10 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
gabe | Tue, 08 June 2004 00:12 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cool1 | Mon, 07 June 2004 23:39 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
takai | Mon, 07 June 2004 23:44 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cool1 | Mon, 07 June 2004 23:49 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
improvedae86 | Tue, 08 June 2004 01:31 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
oldcorollas | Tue, 08 June 2004 03:58 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
TurboRA28 | Tue, 08 June 2004 05:27 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
oldcorollas | Tue, 08 June 2004 05:39 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cool1 | Tue, 08 June 2004 05:49 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cool1 | Tue, 08 June 2004 05:43 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
TurboRA28 | Tue, 08 June 2004 05:49 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Cool1 | Tue, 08 June 2004 05:50 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
YelloRolla | Tue, 08 June 2004 05:55 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
Norbie | Tue, 08 June 2004 05:59 |
|
Re: battery relocation
|
oldcorollas | Tue, 08 June 2004 06:22 |
Current Time:
Tue Jan 21 04:03:06 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0099818706512451 seconds |