Author | Topic |

Location: Gold Coast, QLD
Registered: April 2004
|
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
Fri, 11 June 2004 02:08

|
 |
Well it all depends.....a motor can have that many km on it and still be in decent condition if it's been well looked after. Just look for the usual signs - smoking, rattles, leaks etc. Best bet is to have it inspected by the NRMA or someone who will give an unbiased opinion.
Timing belts need to be replaced every 100000km, so bear in mind that it is probably due for another one at 300000. There should be a record of when it was replaced last, either in the handbook (or at least a receipt) or a sticker on the timing belt cover.
Mine has 260000 on it and it still runs fine, I'm planning to replace it at around 300000 though.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
Les | Wed, 09 June 2004 22:27 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
matt86sx | Wed, 09 June 2004 23:21 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
Les | Thu, 10 June 2004 01:07 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
RobST162 | Thu, 10 June 2004 01:08 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
wiso | Thu, 10 June 2004 03:31 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
matt86sx | Thu, 10 June 2004 04:10 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
Squid | Thu, 10 June 2004 06:29 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
Les | Thu, 10 June 2004 07:00 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
Draza | Thu, 10 June 2004 02:34 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
SillyCar88 | Thu, 10 June 2004 11:02 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
matt86sx | Fri, 11 June 2004 00:26 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
SillyCar88 | Fri, 11 June 2004 06:02 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
Aust162 | Fri, 11 June 2004 12:14 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
smashed_wombat | Fri, 11 June 2004 13:05 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
matt86sx | Tue, 15 June 2004 00:16 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
Les | Tue, 15 June 2004 03:09 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
SCO-77K | Tue, 15 June 2004 03:55 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
Draza | Tue, 15 June 2004 07:22 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
finney | Tue, 15 June 2004 08:08 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
Les | Fri, 18 June 2004 03:41 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
halfplugged | Fri, 11 June 2004 01:08 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
Les | Fri, 11 June 2004 01:31 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
matt86sx | Fri, 11 June 2004 02:08 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
drft spec - st167 | Sat, 12 June 2004 12:54 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
mick | Sat, 12 June 2004 13:13 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
RWDboy | Sun, 13 June 2004 07:40 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
drft spec - st167 | Mon, 14 June 2004 05:19 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
drft spec - st167 | Mon, 14 June 2004 05:20 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
mick | Mon, 14 June 2004 08:22 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
Classique71 | Mon, 14 June 2004 08:35 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
RobST162 | Mon, 14 June 2004 08:44 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
mick | Mon, 14 June 2004 09:07 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
mick | Mon, 14 June 2004 09:17 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
RWDboy | Mon, 14 June 2004 11:29 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
SillyCar88 | Tue, 15 June 2004 11:54 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
Shraka | Wed, 30 June 2004 04:12 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
drft spec - st167 | Thu, 17 June 2004 02:18 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
SillyCar88 | Fri, 18 June 2004 06:33 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
drft spec - st167 | Fri, 18 June 2004 07:36 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
79rollaboy | Wed, 30 June 2004 04:00 |
 |
Re: ST vs SX ST162 Celica
|
RWDboy | Wed, 30 June 2004 09:27 |
Current Time:
Sun Jun 8 07:49:59 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0043630599975586 seconds |