| Author | Topic |
|---|
On Probation
Location:
North East NSW
Registered:
December 2002
|
|
Re: ke20; auto tunnel bigger than manual?
|
Wed, 16 June 2004 05:48
 
|
 |
yeah but even she can run a standard box
it all depends how you treat it i spose. with my driving style, i'm on my second K50 already, tho i'm using old boxes. i'm going to get one rebuilt when i have the cash, maybe some straight cuts and quick sync and shortshift. i have a 4 speed but with 4.3s in the arse i'd be sitting at like 4500+ on the freeway, that would suck
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
ke20; auto tunnel bigger than manual?
|
rotorace | Mon, 07 June 2004 11:46 |
|
Re: ke20; auto tunnel bigger than manual?
|
Dodgy_Haro | Mon, 07 June 2004 13:51 |
|
Re: ke20; auto tunnel bigger than manual?
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 07 June 2004 14:46 |
|
Re: ke20; auto tunnel bigger than manual?
|
ke382TG | Mon, 07 June 2004 22:49 |
|
Re: ke20; auto tunnel bigger than manual?
|
rotorace | Tue, 08 June 2004 09:23 |
|
Re: ke20; auto tunnel bigger than manual?
|
Dodgy_Haro | Tue, 08 June 2004 10:36 |
|
Re: ke20; auto tunnel bigger than manual?
|
Dodgy_Haro | Tue, 08 June 2004 10:37 |
|
Re: ke20; auto tunnel bigger than manual?
|
Super Jamie | Tue, 15 June 2004 02:24 |
|
Re: ke20; auto tunnel bigger than manual?
|
pro_ke | Tue, 15 June 2004 09:50 |
|
Re: ke20; auto tunnel bigger than manual?
|
Super Jamie | Wed, 16 June 2004 05:48 |
|
Re: ke20; auto tunnel bigger than manual?
|
pro_ke | Thu, 17 June 2004 01:03 |
