Author | Topic |

Location: sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
Sat, 26 June 2004 15:44

|
 |
ok im lost.
it says all veihicles originally having a four as the largest engine(so not this class)
but weighting less than 1100kg(which it does)
then the other one says
vehicles weighting more than 1100kg
shyould there not be another class thats vehicles under 1100kg with 6 and 8 cylinders as stock.
anyway im assuming that being under 1100kg the biggest i can go n/a is 3.1 like what cool1 said.
bummer
but a 1j will fit 
or should i go the 260z with the 1uz not as nice thou me thinks.
as for the cressi yeah sold that a while ago and been back into the ta22s.
just missing the power of the six thou
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
engine conversion legality???
|
scrote | Wed, 23 June 2004 17:16 |
 |
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
Cool1 | Wed, 23 June 2004 21:11 |
 |
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
IRA11Y | Wed, 23 June 2004 21:16 |
 |
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
draven | Wed, 23 June 2004 22:46 |
 |
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
oldcorollas | Wed, 23 June 2004 23:37 |
 |
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
oldcorollas | Wed, 23 June 2004 23:39 |
 |
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
draven | Thu, 24 June 2004 00:11 |
 |
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
Farmsci ST162 | Thu, 24 June 2004 11:57 |
 |
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
scrote | Sat, 26 June 2004 15:44 |
 |
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
BradW | Sat, 26 June 2004 16:25 |
 |
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
scrote | Sat, 26 June 2004 18:04 |
 |
Re: engine conversion legality???
|
V8_MA61 | Sun, 27 June 2004 08:12 |