Author | Topic |

Location: Land of Oz
Registered: June 2004
|
Re: conspiracy theory's (my long rant!)
|
Mon, 12 July 2004 10:13

|
 |
Hi,
Long rant warning.... get a drink or a ciggy or a billy and relax if u wanna read my massive rant...
Lucas Heights actually has 2 reactors. One is called HIFAR (High Flux Atomic Reactor) and a smaller one called MOATAR (which is aboriginal for little-fire). Both are used for generating radio isotapes which are mainly used for medical purposes. A lot of the isotapes have a very short half-life and therefore, once created, they must be tranported to the hospital asap.
The pyramids, so I have read, were built by man, but used alien technology (the Ark of Covenant, actually) to help raise the stones.
The Ark was deemed to be in existence way before Moses and was initially in Egypt. It was used extensively for engineering and warefare. The Ark is basically a large condensor and is capable of generating "mfkzt", which is a white powder that comes from the breakdown of pure gold. There is something called the Philosophers Stone (hehehehe not the Harry Potter one - I'm talking the original Philo Stone) which is also used with the Ark. The effects of the Ark, when powered up, can kill with electricity - hence the part in the Bible about dudes having to stay way from the Ark and wear no shoes (to help earth themselves) and other precautions. The transformation of gold, into mfkzt, lightened the Ark until it was weighltess. This effect can be applied to objects - like huge stones for the pyramids. Modern scientific experiments have shown this effect is true. Makes you wodner why gold is so important, when it is quite abundant on the planet and has little to do with money reserves and all that stuff. Why do governments hoard so much gold. Check out the major gold transfers of the past 20years and the massive amounts have been bought and sold to organisations and governments.
The Ark was secreted away into King Solomons temple and survived the first Crusade. However, during the next crusades the Knights Templars, having no place to stay in jerusalem, (1127AD) stayed in the ruins of Solomons old temple. They dug into it and found old catacombs and ancient artifacts. One of these was beleived to be the Ark.
For a few hundred years the Ark was hidden away, and was eventually "yeilded" (presumably to its owners/designers - whoever they may be) in Chartres Cathedral in 1307.
The Bible was "put together" many hundreds of years after the actual jesus thing. Many, many scriptures were written by many many different people. The church picked those scriptures it deemed fitting for the doctrine they wished to follow - ergo, that is why women are not mentioned much in the Bible (old or new testaments). Mary Magdelene was a very powerful and well respected lady, her lineage was the base of the english kings, with refernce to Camelot and the round-table - but this is more Holy Grail history, which I'm not talking about here. The Jews did the same thing with the Old Testament - they selected those books that portrayed what they wanted. There is a lot of ancient scrolls and scriptures that were not included.
In the 2nd meeting of the Church (pope and bishops etc) in 550AD(I think) they took the parts out of the Bible that refer to reincarnation. You see, these passages of text showed that man (and woman, of course) reincarnates their spirit and we live (as spirits/soul) for eternity. However, such a concept undermined the law and power of the church. To ensure people pay homage and respect to the church, then people have to beleive that they will got to hell (man made concept) if they don't pay respect and money to the church.
There is an ancient tribe in Nth Africa (called Dommo, I think) that know that sirius is a double-star (u need a high powered telescope to see that) and also know things about ancient stars and stuff that science is just proving.
Man did make it to the moon. It wasn't Armstrong and co because the radiation in space would kill them after a few days. So, Armstrong and his lads were the hollywood boys who did the fake picture show, while some poor suckers actually went and got the moon rocks etc. These suckers died of radiation poisining a few days after they came back to earth. Reminds me of Capricorn One - remeber that movie? IMHO, I think it would of been harder to fake the moon bit than actually doing it. Like, you gotta fool all the other countries who are listening with radio telescopes that are pointed to space and the moon. Maybe other countries were involved - it's common beleif that Jodderel Bank in the UK was in on the gag.
Stonehenge is one of many structures around the planet that appear to be celestial clocks. Despite the massive effort in building them (tho less effort than required for the pyramids) the amazing part is there spacial accuracy and awareness of the movement of the stars and planets.
Is all I have written true? Dunno. Don't care. It's just what I have read and gleaned over the years of checking out wierd and ancient shit. Check out "Lost Secrets of the Sacred Ark" by Laurence Gardner for more info.
Crikey, what a fucking rave, eh?
seeyuzz
river
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
conspiracy theory's
|
puzzle man | Mon, 05 July 2004 07:18 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
lumpy | Mon, 05 July 2004 07:43 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
frr33q | Mon, 05 July 2004 07:56 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
toynado | Mon, 05 July 2004 08:00 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
RobST162 | Mon, 05 July 2004 09:29 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Tommo | Mon, 05 July 2004 09:32 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Draza | Mon, 05 July 2004 10:02 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
jackel | Mon, 05 July 2004 14:41 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
CrUZsida | Mon, 05 July 2004 23:25 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Shraka | Mon, 05 July 2004 22:14 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
andrij | Mon, 05 July 2004 22:52 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
RWDboy | Tue, 06 July 2004 00:56 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Ms Puzzleman | Tue, 06 July 2004 01:24 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
bigg willie style | Tue, 06 July 2004 03:23 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
toynado | Tue, 06 July 2004 03:43 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
CrUZsida | Tue, 06 July 2004 04:19 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Mookie | Tue, 06 July 2004 05:35 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
thetoyman75 | Tue, 06 July 2004 07:43 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
THE WITZL | Tue, 06 July 2004 08:20 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
thu187 | Tue, 31 May 2005 05:41 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Shraka | Tue, 06 July 2004 08:38 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
DunkyMonkey | Tue, 06 July 2004 09:23 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Squid | Wed, 07 July 2004 04:55 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
bigg willie style | Tue, 06 July 2004 12:25 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
DunkyMonkey | Tue, 06 July 2004 13:38 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Shraka | Tue, 06 July 2004 13:58 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
4DaDrift | Tue, 06 July 2004 14:35 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
DunkyMonkey | Wed, 07 July 2004 00:30 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Squid | Wed, 07 July 2004 05:21 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
4DaDrift | Wed, 07 July 2004 09:23 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
DunkyMonkey | Fri, 09 July 2004 15:17 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
toynado | Tue, 06 July 2004 19:25 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
andrij | Tue, 06 July 2004 21:14 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
puzzle man | Wed, 07 July 2004 05:15 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
DunkyMonkey | Wed, 07 July 2004 06:18 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Squid | Wed, 07 July 2004 06:23 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
toynado | Wed, 07 July 2004 06:28 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Bradelz | Thu, 08 July 2004 12:14 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's (my long rant!)
|
river | Mon, 12 July 2004 10:13 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's (my long rant!)
|
Squid | Thu, 15 July 2004 04:42 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's (my long rant!)
|
griminir | Fri, 03 June 2005 05:21 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
DunkyMonkey | Mon, 12 July 2004 10:46 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
river | Mon, 12 July 2004 11:02 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
DunkyMonkey | Mon, 12 July 2004 12:58 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
dimmy77_03 | Mon, 12 July 2004 11:54 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
river | Mon, 12 July 2004 13:10 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Bill Sherwood | Mon, 12 July 2004 13:51 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
puzzle man | Tue, 13 July 2004 08:08 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
mynameisrodney | Tue, 13 July 2004 08:54 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Squid | Thu, 15 July 2004 03:48 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
DunkyMonkey | Tue, 13 July 2004 15:12 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
thug_immortal | Wed, 14 July 2004 04:16 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
thu187 | Tue, 31 May 2005 05:52 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
toynado | Wed, 14 July 2004 20:51 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Cressida Chick | Thu, 15 July 2004 05:02 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
joyride | Mon, 19 July 2004 19:21 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
h3ff44 | Mon, 30 May 2005 06:59 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
river | Mon, 30 May 2005 07:51 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
unforgiven | Mon, 30 May 2005 07:05 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
puzzle man | Mon, 30 May 2005 10:11 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Intensevil | Mon, 30 May 2005 16:59 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Corona RT142 | Tue, 31 May 2005 05:44 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
spoon33 | Wed, 01 June 2005 07:22 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Caledwvech | Fri, 03 June 2005 03:37 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
Dust | Fri, 03 June 2005 05:10 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
river | Fri, 03 June 2005 08:01 |
 |
Re: conspiracy theory's
|
puzzle man | Fri, 03 June 2005 08:51 |
Current Time:
Mon Jul 7 19:59:15 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0079569816589355 seconds |