| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Northwestern Sydney
Registered:
August 2002
|
|
Re: 16r Specs (Mark II gurus might be able to help)
|
Thu, 29 July 2004 00:41
 
|
 |
|
So what would the chances be of Toyota building an engine that has different rods than any other engine and the engine was only built for about 3-4 years? there must be another engine with similar bottom end surely?
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Stroked 18R (Was 16r specs)
|
Lambolica | Wed, 28 July 2004 08:28 |
|
Re: 16r Specs (Mark II gurus might be able to help)
|
munki | Wed, 28 July 2004 09:32 |
|
Re: 16r Specs (Mark II gurus might be able to help)
|
gianttomato | Wed, 28 July 2004 09:56 |
|
Re: 16r Specs (Mark II gurus might be able to help)
|
Lambolica | Wed, 28 July 2004 10:55 |
|
Re: 16r Specs (Mark II gurus might be able to help)
|
Jayem | Wed, 28 July 2004 12:01 |
|
Re: 16r Specs (Mark II gurus might be able to help)
|
earlyrolla | Wed, 28 July 2004 13:08 |
|
Re: 16r Specs (Mark II gurus might be able to help)
|
Lambolica | Thu, 29 July 2004 00:02 |
|
Re: 16r Specs (Mark II gurus might be able to help)
|
gianttomato | Thu, 29 July 2004 00:36 |
|
Re: 16r Specs (Mark II gurus might be able to help)
|
Lambolica | Thu, 29 July 2004 00:41 |
|
Re: Stroked 18R (Was 16r specs)
|
Lambolica | Thu, 29 July 2004 04:57 |
|
Re: Stroked 18R (Was 16r specs)
|
Purple_Beasty | Thu, 29 July 2004 05:17 |
|
Re: Stroked 18R (Was 16r specs)
|
Lambolica | Thu, 29 July 2004 05:20 |
