Author | Topic |

Toymods Club Treasurer
Location: Sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Thu, 29 July 2004 15:03

|
 |
I'm with FWDBoy here.
Having owned 3 AWD subies in the past, including an import Legacy GT wagon, I can't say the handling is that bad.
You've just got to remember that its a front wheel drive with rear wheel assist, and adapt you've driving style to suit. ie slow in, fast out
The only mods I did to the suspension on mine was a set of 2" lowered springs, with stock springs & swaybars.
With that I would confidently pick my corner speed by getting the advisery sign speed, doubling it, then adding ANOTHER 20KM/H!
I still haven't matched this in the Caldina, despite replacing the entire suspension. Others on this forum can attest to how fast I drive round corners.
Gearboxes & synchros only break because of hamfisted drivers who want to do clutch dumps at 6000rpm.
The clutch is a weak point, but you've got to have something that'll slip otherwise you start breaking other stuff, like gearboxes.
Can't comment on the other 2, but I'd have the Supra over the S15, it communicates better the transistion to oversteer instead of being on/off boost.
But that's just me.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
thug_immortal | Mon, 26 July 2004 08:40 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
ae86drift | Mon, 26 July 2004 08:44 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
AE86slut | Mon, 26 July 2004 08:45 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Simon-AE86 | Mon, 26 July 2004 08:47 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
fade-e | Mon, 26 July 2004 08:49 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Nark | Mon, 26 July 2004 09:21 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
AE86slut | Mon, 26 July 2004 09:24 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
thug_immortal | Mon, 26 July 2004 09:37 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Nark | Mon, 26 July 2004 12:42 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
AE86slut | Mon, 26 July 2004 09:38 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
thug_immortal | Mon, 26 July 2004 09:42 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Evil_Foetus | Mon, 26 July 2004 09:44 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
riceburna73 | Mon, 26 July 2004 09:46 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
olihaub | Mon, 26 July 2004 09:52 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Fro-Daddy | Mon, 26 July 2004 09:59 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
98rollacsx | Mon, 26 July 2004 10:50 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 26 July 2004 10:52 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
ae86drift | Mon, 26 July 2004 10:53 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
nicked | Mon, 26 July 2004 12:59 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
slydar | Mon, 26 July 2004 10:59 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
TokenBlackGuy | Mon, 26 July 2004 11:43 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
ae86drift | Mon, 26 July 2004 11:45 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
7M-Brisbane | Mon, 26 July 2004 14:15 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
AE86slut | Tue, 27 July 2004 04:03 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Nark | Tue, 27 July 2004 04:18 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Jag7799 | Mon, 26 July 2004 15:53 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 27 July 2004 03:53 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Norbie | Tue, 27 July 2004 04:01 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
KOFFEE-BLACK | Thu, 29 July 2004 05:31 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Shraka | Tue, 27 July 2004 04:11 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
RWDboy | Tue, 27 July 2004 04:20 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Nark | Tue, 27 July 2004 04:29 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
AE86slut | Tue, 27 July 2004 04:25 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Nark | Tue, 27 July 2004 04:38 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
gianttomato | Tue, 27 July 2004 04:49 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Mookie | Tue, 27 July 2004 05:44 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Beer_is_good | Tue, 27 July 2004 06:00 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
AE86slut | Tue, 27 July 2004 06:12 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Nark | Tue, 27 July 2004 06:37 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
thug_immortal | Tue, 27 July 2004 06:57 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Nark | Tue, 27 July 2004 07:19 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
mick | Tue, 27 July 2004 07:26 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Camry_omega | Tue, 27 July 2004 07:29 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
thug_immortal | Tue, 27 July 2004 07:32 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
wolf | Tue, 27 July 2004 11:28 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
John K | Thu, 29 July 2004 04:44 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Beer_is_good | Tue, 27 July 2004 06:01 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
SEXY 16 | Tue, 27 July 2004 06:04 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Beer_is_good | Tue, 27 July 2004 06:29 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Jag7799 | Tue, 27 July 2004 10:22 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
draven | Tue, 27 July 2004 10:31 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
mick | Thu, 29 July 2004 07:01 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Norbie | Fri, 30 July 2004 10:31 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
mick | Fri, 30 July 2004 12:39 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
RWDboy | Thu, 29 July 2004 14:31 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
RWDboy | Thu, 29 July 2004 14:39 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
wagonist | Thu, 29 July 2004 15:03 |
 |
Re: What would you buy PERFORMANCE wise?
|
Jag7799 | Fri, 30 July 2004 16:57 |
Current Time:
Mon Jul 21 13:55:06 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0053250789642334 seconds |