Author | Topic |
Location: Melbourne
Registered: January 2003
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Mon, 09 August 2004 02:40
|
|
andrij wrote on Mon, 09 August 2004 11:04 | Damn
I thought the best way to fix an alfa was to buy a sprinter, but i have been proved wrong.
Didnt alfas come with rust as standard, or was that a secret option from the factory that they ALL came out with?
|
The problem of rust doesn't directly come from the russians out smarting the Italians and off loading crap to them . If you really look at the problem its a whole number of things .
1. Vehicle it the Southern plant { Thats eg Alfa Suds { sud meaning South } used to painted 500metres across the road where the finished frames where producted .
No this was not under cover , the finished bodys where produced and left outside on trolleys till there when pushed across the road . This occured all year , so you can imagine cars producted in summer where better than winter . But still build quality was rubbish ,i had a summer build alfa sud which had a small rust section when i had it . But one day before selling it i decided to get all the rust fixed and plastic side sill covers painted . So on removing the side covers , i found both side of the car the sill had been dented in { droped off the line / trolley } and just painted over .Because it was a Ti model they knew covers where going over it .
But worst is this is still continuing today , but what does your normal factory worked do in the south of Italy ? Friday night get your pay , jump on the ferry across to Spain , Party all the way . Party the whole weekend , sleep the sunday night on the way home , and return to work monday . Great fun , but you end up with a crap car at the end .
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
105's are better than sprinters
|
Ramtech | Sat, 07 August 2004 12:42 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Jag7799 | Sat, 07 August 2004 12:50 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
V8_MA61 | Sat, 07 August 2004 12:59 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Norbie | Sat, 07 August 2004 13:33 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
V8_MA61 | Sat, 07 August 2004 13:35 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Intensevil | Sat, 07 August 2004 13:46 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Alainve | Sat, 07 August 2004 13:46 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
monkeymajik | Sat, 07 August 2004 16:30 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Mookie | Sat, 07 August 2004 18:38 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
gianttomato | Sat, 07 August 2004 20:33 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
M.J.H | Sat, 07 August 2004 21:42 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Jayem | Sat, 07 August 2004 21:52 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
improvedae86 | Sun, 08 August 2004 00:46 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Sprinter-Saurus | Sun, 08 August 2004 00:57 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Shraka | Sun, 08 August 2004 04:21 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
MR 1JZ | Sun, 08 August 2004 02:27 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
lumpy | Mon, 09 August 2004 00:53 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
MR 1JZ | Mon, 09 August 2004 02:00 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Sprinter-Saurus | Mon, 09 August 2004 07:46 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
andrij | Mon, 09 August 2004 08:52 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Ramtech | Sun, 08 August 2004 02:27 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Ramtech | Sun, 08 August 2004 02:29 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
MR 1JZ | Sun, 08 August 2004 02:30 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
MR 1JZ | Sun, 08 August 2004 04:24 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Skein | Sun, 08 August 2004 07:54 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Shraka | Sun, 08 August 2004 04:35 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
MR 1JZ | Sun, 08 August 2004 05:05 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Chris Davey | Sun, 08 August 2004 05:59 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
mick | Sun, 08 August 2004 06:51 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
improvedae86 | Sun, 08 August 2004 08:24 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Clown | Sun, 08 August 2004 09:17 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
MR 1JZ | Sun, 08 August 2004 23:29 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
andrij | Mon, 09 August 2004 01:04 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
improvedae86 | Mon, 09 August 2004 02:40 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
MR 1JZ | Mon, 09 August 2004 03:12 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
improvedae86 | Mon, 09 August 2004 03:48 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
riceburna73 | Mon, 09 August 2004 03:23 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
MR 1JZ | Mon, 09 August 2004 03:36 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Norbie | Mon, 09 August 2004 04:04 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
MR 1JZ | Mon, 09 August 2004 04:08 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
MR 1JZ | Mon, 09 August 2004 03:59 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
MR 1JZ | Mon, 09 August 2004 07:54 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
Sprinter-Saurus | Mon, 09 August 2004 10:16 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
MR 1JZ | Mon, 09 August 2004 10:20 |
|
Re: 105's are better than sprinters
|
TRD-ST162 | Wed, 11 August 2004 14:44 |