| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Northmead
Registered:
December 2003
|
|
Re: Panda = Faster?
|
Sat, 28 August 2004 22:14
 
|
 |
HOT FRESH RUMOR:
I heard, from a good, reliable source, that the original concept was called , and get this people, " Initial C"
Story goes, that a certain tofu seller would sell tofu by the big boxful, and needed a fast machine, that handled, and went like the clappers.It was a MS53 crown wagon, with all the good bits. Hence the " C ", for crown. Later, when the orders slowed down, they decided to use an AE86 because it carried less, and went almost as fast, and seeing drifting was starting to become popular, they changed it to " Initial D "
It is also known that the original panda paint job, first seen on the MS53 special was a super rare option that was lost until revived by the AE86.
I am hunting down some leads, but someone told me there is one of these special panda crowns lurking away here in sydney 
I will try and hunt this super rare beast down, and once i find it, will try and take a pic or two for you all.
The hunt for the Initial C rare beast continues.
Wish me luck
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Panda = Faster?
|
andrij | Fri, 27 August 2004 11:17 |
|
Re: Panda = Faster?
|
munki | Fri, 27 August 2004 11:20 |
|
Re: Panda = Faster?
|
andrij | Fri, 27 August 2004 11:37 |
|
Re: Panda = Faster?
|
munki | Fri, 27 August 2004 12:33 |
|
Re: Panda = Faster?
|
andrij | Fri, 27 August 2004 22:17 |
|
Re: Panda = Faster?
|
andrij | Sat, 28 August 2004 00:32 |
|
Re: Panda = Faster?
|
Rallystanza | Sat, 28 August 2004 06:59 |
|
Re: Panda = Faster?
|
Cyber-punk | Sat, 28 August 2004 08:12 |
|
Re: Panda = Faster?
|
mick | Sat, 28 August 2004 15:13 |
|
Re: Panda = Faster?
|
andrij | Sat, 28 August 2004 22:14 |
|
Re: Panda = Faster?
|
draven | Sat, 28 August 2004 22:20 |
