| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 7m-ge model spec differences
|
Wed, 02 October 2002 13:54
 
|
 |
| gianttomato wrote on Wed, 02 October 2002 23:07 |
The double counterweighted crank sounds heavy,
|
You're not wrong there. I tried lifting one once... damn near put my back out! It looks like it's come out of an industrial diesel or something... which explains why you rarely hear about 7M bottom ends coming apart.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
7m-ge model spec differences
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 02 October 2002 04:06 |
|
Re: 7m-ge model spec differences
|
Norbie | Wed, 02 October 2002 05:59 |
|
Re: 7m-ge model spec differences
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 02 October 2002 10:39 |
|
Re: 7m-ge model spec differences
|
Norbie | Wed, 02 October 2002 12:25 |
|
Re: 7m-ge model spec differences
|
TD42T | Wed, 02 October 2002 12:30 |
|
Re: 7m-ge model spec differences
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 02 October 2002 12:57 |
|
Re: 7m-ge model spec differences
|
gianttomato | Wed, 02 October 2002 13:07 |
|
Re: 7m-ge model spec differences
|
Norbie | Wed, 02 October 2002 13:54 |
|
Re: 7m-ge model spec differences
|
gianttomato | Wed, 02 October 2002 14:05 |
|
Re: 7m-ge model spec differences
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 02 October 2002 13:17 |
