| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Brisbane / Gold Coast
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
Mon, 07 October 2002 04:50
 
|
 |
A better example is Formula Atlantic engines of a few years ago. I was talking to a guy that used to build them, and he said that when they went from twin Webers to EFI, they went from 238hp to 242hp. That's pretty much dyno error ...
But at 6,000rpm he got 20hp more!
You don't need a million maps to make a good EFI system, all you need is the right compensation maps to adjust for temperature (which a carby can't do), elevation (which a carby can't do), water temperature (which a carby can't do), air temperature (which a carby can't do), and the engine will run just fine over a large range of conditions very well indeed.
If you want to compare a stock EFI 4AGE to a twin Weber one, make it fair and compare them the other way as well - A quad throttle body EFI one compared to one with a stock inlet manifold and something like a 2" SU hanging off the front of it. Pretty obvious which one would be better. 
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
efi vs carby
|
Ribbo | Mon, 07 October 2002 02:03 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
EMP-2TG | Mon, 07 October 2002 02:43 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
Bill Sherwood | Mon, 07 October 2002 03:31 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
IRA11Y | Mon, 07 October 2002 04:25 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
Bill Sherwood | Mon, 07 October 2002 04:50 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
floody | Mon, 07 October 2002 05:17 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
Blown86 | Mon, 07 October 2002 05:29 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
GIN51E | Mon, 07 October 2002 05:32 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
floody | Mon, 07 October 2002 06:15 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
Norbie | Mon, 07 October 2002 08:24 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
gianttomato | Mon, 07 October 2002 10:18 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
RWDboy | Mon, 07 October 2002 06:41 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
GIN51E | Mon, 07 October 2002 08:27 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
Ribbo | Mon, 07 October 2002 08:21 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
SUPRAGTE | Mon, 07 October 2002 09:20 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
Grega | Mon, 07 October 2002 10:39 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
GIN51E | Mon, 07 October 2002 13:49 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
5KinKP60 | Mon, 07 October 2002 15:19 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 08 October 2002 00:20 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
mrshin | Tue, 08 October 2002 00:34 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
thetoyman75 | Tue, 08 October 2002 00:39 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
mrshin | Tue, 08 October 2002 01:34 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
chrisss | Tue, 08 October 2002 09:18 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
Remedy | Tue, 08 October 2002 10:03 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
GIN51E | Tue, 08 October 2002 10:31 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
chrisss | Tue, 08 October 2002 11:24 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
rjenman | Fri, 21 October 2005 22:24 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
rjenman | Fri, 21 October 2005 22:25 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
hemi twofifteen turbo | Sat, 22 October 2005 01:29 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 22 October 2005 07:28 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
September_Squall | Sat, 22 October 2005 05:24 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
170bhp | Sat, 22 October 2005 08:03 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
oldcorollas | Sat, 22 October 2005 08:07 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
170bhp | Sat, 22 October 2005 08:15 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
river | Sat, 22 October 2005 10:26 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
170bhp | Sat, 22 October 2005 10:41 |
|
Re: efi vs carby
|
170bhp | Sat, 22 October 2005 10:44 |
