| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Castle Hill, Sydney
Registered:
February 2004
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Mon, 20 September 2004 08:43
 
|
 |
its actually 35 litres so we're both idiots
the t-18 kept up with a st185 today, so theres a slightly better example
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
jesseT18 | Fri, 17 September 2004 00:40 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
HyDrA | Fri, 17 September 2004 05:05 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Apollo | Fri, 17 September 2004 10:46 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
jesseT18 | Fri, 17 September 2004 13:20 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
SEXY 16 | Fri, 17 September 2004 23:04 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
jesseT18 | Sat, 18 September 2004 08:16 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Apollo | Sat, 18 September 2004 12:00 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
mick | Sun, 19 September 2004 00:04 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
jesseT18 | Sun, 19 September 2004 08:33 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
jesseT18 | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:43 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Apollo | Mon, 20 September 2004 10:29 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
jesseT18 | Mon, 20 September 2004 11:29 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Apollo | Mon, 20 September 2004 12:35 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
jesseT18 | Tue, 21 September 2004 00:29 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Apollo | Tue, 21 September 2004 05:36 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Celica73 | Tue, 21 September 2004 13:39 |
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
mick | Sat, 25 September 2004 11:51 |
