Author | Topic |

Location: Campbelltown, NSW, Austra...
Registered: January 2004
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Mon, 20 September 2004 09:12

|
 |
Yeah volvo made a concept car designed entireley by women that had a sealed bonnet, opened only at service intervals, plus teflon paint and a number of other "ideas".
Anyway the idea about gps controled speed limiters is stupid, there are situations where you have to exceed the speed limit in order to avoid an accident, there was a case in vic where a man got off a fine for this reason.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
| Mon, 20 September 2004 07:05 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
SIMDOG | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:13 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
ae86drift | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:52 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
MR 1JZ | Mon, 20 September 2004 09:16 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Rolla Boy | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:43 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
st184 sillycar | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:27 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Jag7799 | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:57 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Tats | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:24 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Chris Davey | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:43 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
st184 sillycar | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:53 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Camry_omega | Mon, 20 September 2004 09:12 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
| Mon, 20 September 2004 09:24 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
b1gb3n | Mon, 20 September 2004 16:59 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
matt86sx | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:05 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
MR 1JZ | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:53 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
dimmy77_03 | Mon, 20 September 2004 09:53 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
RWDboy | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:00 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
AE86slut | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:15 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Rolla Boy | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:57 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
sharif123 | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:43 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
RobST162 | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:49 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
b1gb3n | Tue, 21 September 2004 02:29 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Jag7799 | Tue, 21 September 2004 02:57 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Toobs | Wed, 22 September 2004 03:28 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
fractoid | Tue, 21 September 2004 14:00 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Jag7799 | Tue, 21 September 2004 14:11 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
3S-GE_Man | Tue, 21 September 2004 15:04 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
st184 sillycar | Thu, 23 September 2004 10:07 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 23 September 2004 10:11 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
fractoid | Thu, 23 September 2004 12:33 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 23 September 2004 12:55 |
 |
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
river | Thu, 23 September 2004 13:06 |