| Author | Topic |
|---|
I Supported Toymods
Location:
south Melbourne/KL
Registered:
June 2004
|
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Mon, 20 September 2004 16:59
 
|
 |
| JETSPEEDCAMRY wrote on Mon, 20 September 2004 19:24 |
Very true. I don't know how they can implement them anyhow. It would mean that every car would have to be modified to contain one of these 'limiters'. Otherwise, every new car would be much slower in reality than older cars....WTF.
One of the arguments is that soon, we will be running out of oil, and thus petrol. So, all cars that run on petrol will be scraped because there useless. And that new cars, with alternate energy systems will contain more electronics than mechanics, like electronics brakes and steering. We'll be driving hoping we don't have any dry joints in our car circuitry....hmmmmm. 
|
soon our destination and everything will be controled by gps as well. Sitting in our very own car is no different than sitting in a cab.
I'm gonna be an automotive engineer when i graduate and u have my word that i'll give my full support to internal combustion and probably rocket engines on road cars!!!
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
| Mon, 20 September 2004 07:05 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
SIMDOG | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:13 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
ae86drift | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:52 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
MR 1JZ | Mon, 20 September 2004 09:16 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Rolla Boy | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:43 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
st184 sillycar | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:27 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Jag7799 | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:57 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Tats | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:24 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Chris Davey | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:43 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
st184 sillycar | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:53 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Camry_omega | Mon, 20 September 2004 09:12 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
| Mon, 20 September 2004 09:24 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
b1gb3n | Mon, 20 September 2004 16:59 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
matt86sx | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:05 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
MR 1JZ | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:53 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
dimmy77_03 | Mon, 20 September 2004 09:53 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
RWDboy | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:00 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
AE86slut | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:15 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Rolla Boy | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:57 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
sharif123 | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:43 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
RobST162 | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:49 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
b1gb3n | Tue, 21 September 2004 02:29 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Jag7799 | Tue, 21 September 2004 02:57 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Toobs | Wed, 22 September 2004 03:28 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
fractoid | Tue, 21 September 2004 14:00 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Jag7799 | Tue, 21 September 2004 14:11 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
3S-GE_Man | Tue, 21 September 2004 15:04 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
st184 sillycar | Thu, 23 September 2004 10:07 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 23 September 2004 10:11 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
fractoid | Thu, 23 September 2004 12:33 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 23 September 2004 12:55 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
river | Thu, 23 September 2004 13:06 |
