| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Epping, Sydney
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Tue, 21 September 2004 01:49
 
|
 |
| Quote: |
Don't worry boys. Can you imagine the government implementing this as a rule? It would cut out one of their MAJOR sources of revenue - Speeding fines. AND, would prove them wrong by showing that speed is in fact NOT the major contributor in road fatalities when the number of deaths didn't decrease.
On the other hand, I can imagine them implementing the one where you can break the speed limit, but it will automatically fine you. Imagine the increase in revenue then! Road fatalities would also increase because everyone would be glued to their speedo (even more so than now) rather than watching the road.
And finally, what would happen if you needed to get out of the way of an out of control truck or something, but couldn't go fast enough coz your stupid goddam car won't accelerate anymore......
I'm getting fired up now!!!
|
hahahaha W3RD!  I agree with every key stroke
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
| Mon, 20 September 2004 07:05 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
SIMDOG | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:13 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
ae86drift | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:52 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
MR 1JZ | Mon, 20 September 2004 09:16 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Rolla Boy | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:43 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
st184 sillycar | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:27 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Jag7799 | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:57 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Tats | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:24 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Chris Davey | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:43 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
st184 sillycar | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:53 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Camry_omega | Mon, 20 September 2004 09:12 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
| Mon, 20 September 2004 09:24 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
b1gb3n | Mon, 20 September 2004 16:59 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
matt86sx | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:05 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
MR 1JZ | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:53 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
dimmy77_03 | Mon, 20 September 2004 09:53 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
RWDboy | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:00 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
AE86slut | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:15 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Rolla Boy | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:57 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
sharif123 | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:43 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
RobST162 | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:49 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
b1gb3n | Tue, 21 September 2004 02:29 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Jag7799 | Tue, 21 September 2004 02:57 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Toobs | Wed, 22 September 2004 03:28 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
fractoid | Tue, 21 September 2004 14:00 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Jag7799 | Tue, 21 September 2004 14:11 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
3S-GE_Man | Tue, 21 September 2004 15:04 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
st184 sillycar | Thu, 23 September 2004 10:07 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 23 September 2004 10:11 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
fractoid | Thu, 23 September 2004 12:33 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 23 September 2004 12:55 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
river | Thu, 23 September 2004 13:06 |
