| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Tue, 21 September 2004 02:57
 
|
 |
| b1gb3n wrote on Tue, 21 September 2004 12:29 |
honestly i think the next thing to come along is hover crafts in maybe 10 yrs. In fact, there are a few dudes who managed to make it already. problem is that its too expensive for mass production and probably fuel consumption as well.
Back to road cars. I think it was in germany where cars have something like a magnet thing in them. and there's magnet on the road as well. Basically the driver doesnt have to drive as these magnetic forces will keep them in their lanes. And they will also be able to keep their distance frm other cars as well. its a great idea/invention for housewives!! anyway, the downside to that was it wouldnt stop if there was a person or cat running across the road.
wonders of technology.
|
the only problem with those things is if it fails
cause the driver wont be paying attention.. he will get fucked
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
| Mon, 20 September 2004 07:05 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
SIMDOG | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:13 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
ae86drift | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:52 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
MR 1JZ | Mon, 20 September 2004 09:16 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Rolla Boy | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:43 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
st184 sillycar | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:27 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Jag7799 | Mon, 20 September 2004 07:57 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Tats | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:24 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Chris Davey | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:43 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
st184 sillycar | Mon, 20 September 2004 08:53 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Camry_omega | Mon, 20 September 2004 09:12 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
| Mon, 20 September 2004 09:24 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
b1gb3n | Mon, 20 September 2004 16:59 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
matt86sx | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:05 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
MR 1JZ | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:53 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
dimmy77_03 | Mon, 20 September 2004 09:53 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
RWDboy | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:00 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
AE86slut | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:15 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Rolla Boy | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:57 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
sharif123 | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:43 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
RobST162 | Tue, 21 September 2004 01:49 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
b1gb3n | Tue, 21 September 2004 02:29 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Jag7799 | Tue, 21 September 2004 02:57 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Toobs | Wed, 22 September 2004 03:28 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
fractoid | Tue, 21 September 2004 14:00 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
Jag7799 | Tue, 21 September 2004 14:11 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
3S-GE_Man | Tue, 21 September 2004 15:04 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
st184 sillycar | Thu, 23 September 2004 10:07 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 23 September 2004 10:11 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
fractoid | Thu, 23 September 2004 12:33 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 23 September 2004 12:55 |
|
Re: No NEED FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS
|
river | Thu, 23 September 2004 13:06 |
