Author | Topic |

Location: Brisbane
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
Wed, 29 September 2004 01:58

|
 |
THE WITZL wrote on Wed, 29 September 2004 11:28 | the angle at which RA65 struts sit on the RA65 is greater than on the AE86/AE71/RA2* and hence would create positive camber.
I would go with the RT132 struts. Just go into a self serve wreckers and do some test fitting on an AE71/KE70 - they are the same.
|
Yeah thats fair enough, but if he is keen on using MX62 struts (which he seems to be), I thought that he might like to know that I'm pretty sure that the camber will be close to the same between RA6X and MX62 struts (but RA6X struts have bigger brakes).
I also think he should go the RT132 struts!
Cheers
Wilbo
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
Flogbag | Mon, 27 September 2004 12:20 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
Flogbag | Mon, 27 September 2004 12:48 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
wilbo666 | Tue, 28 September 2004 00:31 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
THE WITZL | Tue, 28 September 2004 01:16 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
EVOSTi | Tue, 28 September 2004 06:27 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
ra23celica | Tue, 28 September 2004 06:47 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
EVOSTi | Tue, 28 September 2004 06:54 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
CLG | Tue, 28 September 2004 07:48 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
Flogbag | Tue, 28 September 2004 10:53 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
wilbo666 | Wed, 29 September 2004 01:15 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
THE WITZL | Wed, 29 September 2004 01:28 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
wilbo666 | Wed, 29 September 2004 01:58 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
Flogbag | Wed, 29 September 2004 07:08 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
wilbo666 | Wed, 29 September 2004 08:49 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
EVOSTi | Wed, 29 September 2004 11:13 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
Flogbag | Wed, 29 September 2004 11:56 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
EVOSTi | Wed, 29 September 2004 12:01 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
Flogbag | Wed, 29 September 2004 12:06 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
EVOSTi | Wed, 29 September 2004 12:09 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
EVOSTi | Wed, 29 September 2004 12:10 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
Flogbag | Wed, 29 September 2004 12:18 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
ae86drift | Wed, 29 September 2004 12:22 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
EVOSTi | Wed, 29 September 2004 12:29 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
Flogbag | Wed, 29 September 2004 12:32 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
ae86drift | Wed, 29 September 2004 12:36 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
EVOSTi | Thu, 30 September 2004 07:05 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
Flogbag | Thu, 30 September 2004 08:25 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
Flogbag | Thu, 30 September 2004 08:31 |
 |
Re: vented single piston OR twin piston solid
|
EVOSTi | Thu, 30 September 2004 08:54 |