| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
Sun, 03 October 2004 01:55
 
|
 |
The engineer I spoke to about my 2JZ conversion told me that provided the car is post-77 (when some brake-related ADR came into effect), and provided the engine fits within the 2.5x/3x rule, a brake upgrade is not required for engineering in Qld!
I'm still doing a brake upgrade of course, and it would be a top priority if I was turbocharging an old Celica. Wait a minute, I am turbocharging an old Celica.  Luckily I already have a brake upgrade (MA61 fronts) since the stockers were barely adequate for a stock 18R-G.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
matt_84 | Fri, 01 October 2004 04:14 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
rob_RA40 | Fri, 01 October 2004 04:16 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
ke382TG | Fri, 01 October 2004 04:18 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
matt_84 | Fri, 01 October 2004 04:35 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 01 October 2004 04:43 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
hemi twofifteen turbo | Fri, 01 October 2004 07:47 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
mrshin | Fri, 01 October 2004 08:51 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
IRA11Y | Fri, 01 October 2004 22:50 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
oldcorollas | Tue, 05 October 2004 11:54 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
Norbie | Sat, 02 October 2004 12:09 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
thechuckster | Sat, 02 October 2004 12:55 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
matt_84 | Sat, 02 October 2004 15:03 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
Chris Davey | Sat, 02 October 2004 22:45 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
allencr | Sun, 03 October 2004 00:25 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
Norbie | Sun, 03 October 2004 01:55 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
gold28 | Tue, 05 October 2004 11:41 |
|
Re: Rear discs vs. better fronts
|
river | Tue, 05 October 2004 12:44 |
