| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Vic, AU
Registered:
September 2004
|
|
Re: Lowered springs on std shocks
|
Fri, 08 October 2004 09:01
 
|
 |
Technically speaking, the springs SHOULD be fully captured when the shock is fully extended... It is quite possibly that during a compression/rebound stroke the spring could come "loose" and end up caught between the strut top/bottom and cause some damage.
The odds of this happening are extremely rare, depending on shock rate, spring size, bump stop size, etc, etc. If you cut the springs to much, remove the bump stops and run shitty shocks, it's quite possible for the spring to compress to much and have the shock extend quicker/further than the springs.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Lowered springs on std shocks
|
spirokeet | Thu, 07 October 2004 02:35 |
|
Re: Lowered springs on std shocks
|
Norbie | Thu, 07 October 2004 03:03 |
|
Re: Lowered springs on std shocks
|
spirokeet | Thu, 07 October 2004 03:29 |
|
Re: Lowered springs on std shocks
|
Celica_John | Thu, 07 October 2004 03:48 |
|
Re: Lowered springs on std shocks
|
spirokeet | Thu, 07 October 2004 03:54 |
|
Re: Lowered springs on std shocks
|
b1gb3n | Fri, 08 October 2004 02:30 |
|
Re: Lowered springs on std shocks
|
Norbie | Fri, 08 October 2004 03:03 |
|
Re: Lowered springs on std shocks
|
spirokeet | Fri, 08 October 2004 04:19 |
|
Re: Lowered springs on std shocks
|
indian | Fri, 08 October 2004 06:16 |
|
Re: Lowered springs on std shocks
|
b1gb3n | Fri, 08 October 2004 06:29 |
|
Re: Lowered springs on std shocks
|
spirokeet | Fri, 08 October 2004 07:42 |
|
Re: Lowered springs on std shocks
|
b1gb3n | Fri, 08 October 2004 07:46 |
|
Re: Lowered springs on std shocks
|
gr8r-x | Fri, 08 October 2004 09:01 |
|
Re: Lowered springs on std shocks
|
adavy84 | Fri, 08 October 2004 12:55 |
