| Author | Topic |
|---|
Toymods Social Secretary
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
Mon, 11 October 2004 01:58
 
|
 |
if you are converting to turbo, its a matter of preference really.
AFM has following features:
# Bigport head, thus needs TVIS intake manifold for turbo
# 8.0:1 pistons
# 3-rib block
MAP sensor has:
# Smallport head, thus need a 100kW intake mani for turbo
# 8.9:1 pistons
# 7-rib block
# piston oil squirters
these would be the things you are more intersted in if you were to be doing a Turbo conversion....
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
map vs. afm?
|
4A-GTE | Sun, 10 October 2004 08:34 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
DunkyMonkey | Sun, 10 October 2004 12:21 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 10 October 2004 12:33 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
mrshin | Sun, 10 October 2004 14:28 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
THE WITZL | Sun, 10 October 2004 14:34 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
mrshin | Sun, 10 October 2004 14:56 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
THE WITZL | Sun, 10 October 2004 15:03 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
no_tofu_speed | Sun, 10 October 2004 15:23 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
inertia | Sun, 10 October 2004 15:54 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
RWDboy | Sun, 10 October 2004 16:00 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 11 October 2004 00:13 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
4A-GTE | Mon, 11 October 2004 00:49 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
RWDboy | Mon, 11 October 2004 01:55 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
THE WITZL | Mon, 11 October 2004 01:58 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 11 October 2004 02:14 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 11 October 2004 02:16 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
RWDboy | Mon, 11 October 2004 02:34 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
indian | Mon, 11 October 2004 05:47 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
quest | Wed, 13 October 2004 23:26 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
RWDboy | Thu, 14 October 2004 02:37 |
|
Re: map vs. afm?
|
quest | Thu, 14 October 2004 06:32 |
