Author | Topic |
Location: Brisbane
Registered: February 2003
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Sat, 23 October 2004 10:16
|
|
hickoz_bro wrote on Sat, 23 October 2004 19:52 | before you start ramming the "search" word down my throat, i asked questions that i haven't found in search... and the question wasn't "where can i get a 1ggte" but "what did the 1ggte come in originally?" ie, when the 1ggte left the toyota factory, what vehicle was it in? surely they didn't just produce a bunch of engines and stick them in the front end of wrecked cars, so they could sell them off as front cuts?
and i asked the question about the crossmember 'cause the article says that there is no modification required to the x-member, but a number of people i've spoken to seem to think other wise, but no-one has answered my question... perhaps no-one really knows... hmmm...
|
cars that may have used 1G-GTE...
this site seems to be quite comprehensive and not limited to one country:
<http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Pit/9975/tm_ind ex.html>
follow 'Engine' link then onto 'Models vs engines'
or via the 'Models' link on the main page.
the question seemed a bit academic as the only thing you'll find a 1G engine in is probably the warehouse of an parts importer.... sorry if i was a bit harsh.
Modification of cross member will depend on the sump of the engine - and whether you want to try an use a TA series cross member (suits a front sump 1G) or retain the RA crossmember (suits a mid sump 1G).
i think both options require repositioning of the mounts on the cross member... am pretty sure the RA member does otherwise the engine sits too high and lacks the10 degree lean to intake side requries to clear you steering/brakes.
When i eventually do my 1G install (into RA40) it will be with RA cross member and i will modify the mounts to get engine in the right spot.
but again, read up on the various installs - they will indicate what sump/cross member combination they used and what was done to the mounts welded onto the crossmember.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
200hp 22r
|
luked | Fri, 24 September 2004 08:27 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Nark | Fri, 24 September 2004 08:51 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
mrshin | Fri, 24 September 2004 09:12 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
MR 1JZ | Fri, 24 September 2004 10:26 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Bradelz | Sun, 26 September 2004 09:33 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
ViPeR_NiPPleX | Fri, 24 September 2004 13:00 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
MR 1JZ | Sat, 25 September 2004 02:34 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Stefan | Fri, 24 September 2004 13:47 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
luked | Sun, 26 September 2004 08:28 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
mrshin | Fri, 24 September 2004 13:50 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Stefan | Fri, 24 September 2004 13:57 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
M.W.P. | Fri, 24 September 2004 14:45 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
sideshow | Sat, 25 September 2004 00:51 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
7M-Brisbane | Sat, 25 September 2004 08:59 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
mrshin | Sat, 25 September 2004 11:29 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
quest | Sun, 26 September 2004 05:02 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Sun, 26 September 2004 08:36 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Sun, 26 September 2004 12:22 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Mudgutts | Tue, 22 February 2005 13:47 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
quest | Sun, 26 September 2004 12:20 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
quest | Sun, 26 September 2004 13:02 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Sun, 26 September 2004 23:58 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
luked | Mon, 27 September 2004 09:07 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
djmickyg | Mon, 27 September 2004 06:30 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
ViPeR_NiPPleX | Mon, 27 September 2004 07:49 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
djmickyg | Mon, 27 September 2004 11:01 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
quest | Mon, 27 September 2004 18:34 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Mon, 27 September 2004 22:57 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
quest | Tue, 28 September 2004 05:56 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
ReP_XT | Mon, 27 September 2004 07:49 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
djmickyg | Tue, 28 September 2004 06:03 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
batteryman | Tue, 28 September 2004 06:11 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
djmickyg | Tue, 28 September 2004 06:53 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
sideshow | Tue, 28 September 2004 09:30 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
quest | Tue, 28 September 2004 14:23 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
batteryman | Tue, 28 September 2004 22:31 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Tue, 19 October 2004 12:39 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Allan | Tue, 22 February 2005 14:03 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
mrshin | Tue, 19 October 2004 14:16 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Tue, 19 October 2004 14:35 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Tue, 19 October 2004 23:39 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Thu, 21 October 2004 13:15 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
mrshin | Thu, 21 October 2004 13:26 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Thu, 21 October 2004 13:48 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Fri, 22 October 2004 00:04 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Sat, 23 October 2004 08:34 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
thechuckster | Sat, 23 October 2004 09:25 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Sat, 23 October 2004 09:52 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
thechuckster | Sat, 23 October 2004 10:16 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Sat, 23 October 2004 10:40 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
thechuckster | Sat, 23 October 2004 11:44 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Sat, 23 October 2004 10:42 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Sat, 23 October 2004 10:54 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Anthony55 | Fri, 22 October 2004 01:54 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Fri, 22 October 2004 02:36 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
MR 1JZ | Fri, 22 October 2004 02:37 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Corona RT142 | Sat, 23 October 2004 11:05 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
mrshin | Sat, 23 October 2004 13:51 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Wed, 27 October 2004 12:54 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
batteryman | Tue, 22 February 2005 21:59 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Tue, 22 February 2005 23:46 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
THE WITZL | Tue, 22 February 2005 22:18 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
river | Tue, 22 February 2005 22:24 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
THE WITZL | Tue, 22 February 2005 22:56 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Mudgutts | Wed, 23 February 2005 05:04 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Allan | Tue, 22 February 2005 23:22 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
ViPeR_NiPPleX | Wed, 23 February 2005 01:25 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
THE WITZL | Tue, 22 February 2005 23:45 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 23 February 2005 05:14 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
THE WITZL | Wed, 23 February 2005 05:35 |