Author | Topic |
Location: Brisbane
Registered: February 2003
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Sat, 23 October 2004 11:44
|
|
hickoz_bro wrote on Sat, 23 October 2004 20:40 | thanks for that, much more helpful, and thanks for clearing up the x-member issue, (assuming your right) is there any reason you'd go for the TA x-member? is it just a matter of being easier to find one compared with finding a rear sump 1g?
|
well.. i pulled a 1G out of an RA40 and the crossmember mounts had been modified ... and i spent hours of time reading up on other people's 1G installs... so i guess i must know a bit about it.
The TA cross member allows you to use a front-sump engine - which are more common as the 1G tended tended to be used in cars with rear-curving cross-members that had rack-n-pinion steering attached to it.
why an i staying with the RA40? for several reasons, the R series cross members are more common, there's already one in my RA40, and i already have a 1G with sump (mid-rear if we want to use the right term) to suit.
but... over to your concerns about costs - my original turbo build up of the RA40 was supposed to cost about $5-7k - total bill after the body work, engine work, turbo work etc. was nearly $14k.
Even if you went the Z option, don't think on-the-cheap will give you a reliable, good looking and fine driving road/sports car..
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
200hp 22r
|
luked | Fri, 24 September 2004 08:27 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Nark | Fri, 24 September 2004 08:51 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
mrshin | Fri, 24 September 2004 09:12 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
MR 1JZ | Fri, 24 September 2004 10:26 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Bradelz | Sun, 26 September 2004 09:33 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
ViPeR_NiPPleX | Fri, 24 September 2004 13:00 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
MR 1JZ | Sat, 25 September 2004 02:34 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Stefan | Fri, 24 September 2004 13:47 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
luked | Sun, 26 September 2004 08:28 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
mrshin | Fri, 24 September 2004 13:50 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Stefan | Fri, 24 September 2004 13:57 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
M.W.P. | Fri, 24 September 2004 14:45 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
sideshow | Sat, 25 September 2004 00:51 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
7M-Brisbane | Sat, 25 September 2004 08:59 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
mrshin | Sat, 25 September 2004 11:29 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
quest | Sun, 26 September 2004 05:02 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Sun, 26 September 2004 08:36 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Sun, 26 September 2004 12:22 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Mudgutts | Tue, 22 February 2005 13:47 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
quest | Sun, 26 September 2004 12:20 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
quest | Sun, 26 September 2004 13:02 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Sun, 26 September 2004 23:58 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
luked | Mon, 27 September 2004 09:07 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
djmickyg | Mon, 27 September 2004 06:30 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
ViPeR_NiPPleX | Mon, 27 September 2004 07:49 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
djmickyg | Mon, 27 September 2004 11:01 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
quest | Mon, 27 September 2004 18:34 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Mon, 27 September 2004 22:57 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
quest | Tue, 28 September 2004 05:56 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
ReP_XT | Mon, 27 September 2004 07:49 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
djmickyg | Tue, 28 September 2004 06:03 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
batteryman | Tue, 28 September 2004 06:11 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
djmickyg | Tue, 28 September 2004 06:53 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
sideshow | Tue, 28 September 2004 09:30 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
quest | Tue, 28 September 2004 14:23 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
batteryman | Tue, 28 September 2004 22:31 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Tue, 19 October 2004 12:39 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Allan | Tue, 22 February 2005 14:03 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
mrshin | Tue, 19 October 2004 14:16 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Tue, 19 October 2004 14:35 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Tue, 19 October 2004 23:39 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Thu, 21 October 2004 13:15 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
mrshin | Thu, 21 October 2004 13:26 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Thu, 21 October 2004 13:48 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Fri, 22 October 2004 00:04 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Sat, 23 October 2004 08:34 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
thechuckster | Sat, 23 October 2004 09:25 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Sat, 23 October 2004 09:52 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
thechuckster | Sat, 23 October 2004 10:16 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Sat, 23 October 2004 10:40 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
thechuckster | Sat, 23 October 2004 11:44 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Sat, 23 October 2004 10:42 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Sat, 23 October 2004 10:54 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Anthony55 | Fri, 22 October 2004 01:54 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Norbie | Fri, 22 October 2004 02:36 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
MR 1JZ | Fri, 22 October 2004 02:37 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Corona RT142 | Sat, 23 October 2004 11:05 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
mrshin | Sat, 23 October 2004 13:51 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Wed, 27 October 2004 12:54 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
batteryman | Tue, 22 February 2005 21:59 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
hickoz_bro | Tue, 22 February 2005 23:46 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
THE WITZL | Tue, 22 February 2005 22:18 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
river | Tue, 22 February 2005 22:24 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
THE WITZL | Tue, 22 February 2005 22:56 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Mudgutts | Wed, 23 February 2005 05:04 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
Allan | Tue, 22 February 2005 23:22 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
ViPeR_NiPPleX | Wed, 23 February 2005 01:25 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
THE WITZL | Tue, 22 February 2005 23:45 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 23 February 2005 05:14 |
|
Re: 200hp 22r
|
THE WITZL | Wed, 23 February 2005 05:35 |