| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Canberra
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
Tue, 26 October 2004 09:01
 
|
 |
Matt,
you have a Gen 2 motor fitted with Gen 1 manifolds and ECU.The power gains that yeilds are difficult to tell, Gen 2 motor produces 117kw (14kw hike). HOWEVER there are three main differences from gen 1-2. Ecu mapping, Compression ratio and Inlet manifold design. Not having the intake and ecu from a gen 2 will starve it of top end power, the gen 1 manifold is aimed at producing low end torque. But, you do have added compression on your side.
SO! The theory of it is that you'll have better low end torque than a gen 2. You'll have better midrange torque than a Gen 1 (thanks to compression) but the top end power difference would most likely be minimal.
Cheers
Steve
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
GEN ? 3S-GE
|
Matt-itude | Mon, 25 October 2004 09:56 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
RWDboy | Mon, 25 October 2004 13:43 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
Matt-itude | Mon, 25 October 2004 13:45 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
CLG | Mon, 25 October 2004 15:56 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
FWDCelica | Mon, 25 October 2004 22:04 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
Matt-itude | Mon, 25 October 2004 22:52 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
RobST162 | Mon, 25 October 2004 23:06 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
Matt-itude | Mon, 25 October 2004 23:08 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
Matt-itude | Mon, 25 October 2004 23:17 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
RobST162 | Mon, 25 October 2004 23:47 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
matt86sx | Tue, 26 October 2004 00:21 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
3sfe | Tue, 26 October 2004 00:22 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
Matt-itude | Tue, 26 October 2004 02:08 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
510rob | Tue, 26 October 2004 02:26 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
RobST162 | Tue, 26 October 2004 05:05 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
Farmsci ST162 | Tue, 26 October 2004 09:01 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
Matt-itude | Tue, 26 October 2004 09:13 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
Farmsci ST162 | Tue, 26 October 2004 09:26 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
Matt-itude | Tue, 26 October 2004 09:30 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
Farmsci ST162 | Tue, 26 October 2004 09:41 |
|
Re: GEN ? 3S-GE
|
bergerac | Tue, 26 October 2004 15:38 |
