Author | Topic |

Location: Perth
Registered: October 2004
|
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
Tue, 02 November 2004 02:36

|
 |
Not a bad price. You're a few grand short of a Type R, but have you considered Toyota/Lexus Soarer's, Nissan 300zx, or even a 1991 Celica GT4 (4wd turbo)?
The Celica looks good, will be cheap to run/maintain, will handle okay (partly because it's not going very fast) but that's about it.
A last option is a 1989-1993 Celica, and do that up.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
96 Celica SX
|
Xizor | Tue, 02 November 2004 01:16 |
 |
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
buck naked | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:18 |
 |
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
Dust | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:23 |
 |
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
Xizor | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:23 |
 |
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
buck naked | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:26 |
 |
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
Xizor | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:29 |
 |
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
buck naked | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:36 |
 |
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
Xizor | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:42 |
 |
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
ae95 | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:39 |
 |
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
buck naked | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:57 |
 |
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
Xizor | Tue, 02 November 2004 03:04 |
 |
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
Xizor | Tue, 02 November 2004 22:12 |