| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
November 2004
|
|
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
Tue, 02 November 2004 02:42
 
|
 |
| buck naked wrote on Tue, 02 November 2004 13:36 |
Not a bad price. You're a few grand short of a Type R, but have you considered Toyota/Lexus Soarer's, Nissan 300zx, or even a 1991 Celica GT4 (4wd turbo)?
The Celica looks good, will be cheap to run/maintain, will handle okay (partly because it's not going very fast) but that's about it.
A last option is a 1989-1993 Celica, and do that up.
|
To be honest mate i really dont know shit about cars, so me doing it up aint gonna happen.
I do like the Soarers, but i can only find autos. I must drive a manual, it keeps me sane.
I have looked at the 300ZX's... they actually puzzle me. Are they 2 seaters or what? I want a back seat. Im thinking they are probably a bit too hot, would require comprehensive insurance and attract too much 'attention'.
GT4 would be nice, a friend said they cost a bucketload for parts and labour though..
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
96 Celica SX
|
Xizor | Tue, 02 November 2004 01:16 |
|
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
buck naked | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:18 |
|
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
Dust | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:23 |
|
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
Xizor | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:23 |
|
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
buck naked | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:26 |
|
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
Xizor | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:29 |
|
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
buck naked | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:36 |
|
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
Xizor | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:42 |
|
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
ae95 | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:39 |
|
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
buck naked | Tue, 02 November 2004 02:57 |
|
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
Xizor | Tue, 02 November 2004 03:04 |
|
Re: 96 Celica SX
|
Xizor | Tue, 02 November 2004 22:12 |
