| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
April 2004
|
|
Re: cusco camber tops 'low castor' ?
|
Thu, 04 November 2004 20:33
 
|
 |
Well low/negative would make sense. But negative = bad. So thats why I figuired it couldnt be that. =/
The ozpec's have less than the jap specs? So your saying the cusco low's would be the same as ozspec and normal would infact be postivive?.
Heh. Why cant they just say +1 or -1 ... =/
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
cusco camber tops 'low castor' ?
|
bathurst-91 | Thu, 04 November 2004 19:44 |
|
Re: cusco camber tops 'low castor' ?
|
ae95 | Thu, 04 November 2004 20:10 |
|
Re: cusco camber tops 'low castor' ?
|
bathurst-91 | Thu, 04 November 2004 20:33 |
|
Re: cusco camber tops 'low castor' ?
|
ae86slaver | Thu, 04 November 2004 23:36 |
|
Re: cusco camber tops 'low castor' ?
|
Youngy | Fri, 05 November 2004 02:41 |
|
Re: cusco camber tops 'low castor' ?
|
bathurst-91 | Fri, 05 November 2004 02:55 |
|
Re: cusco camber tops 'low castor' ?
|
Satoshi | Fri, 05 November 2004 02:57 |
|
Re: cusco camber tops 'low castor' ?
|
bathurst-91 | Fri, 05 November 2004 03:08 |
|
Re: cusco camber tops 'low castor' ?
|
Satoshi | Fri, 12 November 2004 17:45 |
|
Re: cusco camber tops 'low castor' ?
|
takai | Fri, 12 November 2004 23:49 |
|
Re: cusco camber tops 'low castor' ?
|
bathurst-91 | Sat, 13 November 2004 00:25 |
|
Re: cusco camber tops 'low castor' ?
|
takai | Sat, 13 November 2004 00:32 |
|
Re: cusco camber tops 'low castor' ?
|
Satoshi | Sat, 13 November 2004 04:27 |
