| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: Clutch costs + other
|
Fri, 26 November 2004 00:55
|
 |
Ceramic is the friction material, and it's arranged in "pucks" (usually 3/4/5 of them) instead of a full face like conventional organic clutches. The idea is to have a lower surface area, which makes the clutch "grab" better - but the downside is you lose a lot of the progressiveness of a full-face clutch. The lower the number of pucks, the "grabbier" it gets, but the more power it can handle without slipping.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Clutch costs + other
|
1ggte89 | Tue, 23 November 2004 11:02 |
|
Re: Clutch costs + other
|
Pube | Wed, 24 November 2004 08:52 |
|
Re: Clutch costs + other
|
PHA77R | Wed, 24 November 2004 11:29 |
|
Re: Clutch costs + other
|
Norbie | Wed, 24 November 2004 23:57 |
|
Re: Clutch costs + other
|
Toobs | Thu, 25 November 2004 05:46 |
|
Re: Clutch costs + other
|
mrshin | Thu, 25 November 2004 10:23 |
|
Re: Clutch costs + other
|
kayot1k | Thu, 25 November 2004 13:41 |
|
Re: Clutch costs + other
|
Norbie | Fri, 26 November 2004 00:55 |
