| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
April 2004
|
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
Thu, 02 December 2004 22:16
 
|
 |
Well. Im running KMAC springs. They are progressive, which in essance means the spring rate is not static. I went with a 5kg/mm front and 4kg/mm rear (ae86) and I can tell you that their spring rates are stiffer than other brands. Maybe this is because their method of making them to custom specs meant that they used 5kg/mm as the lowest possible rate and variations increase the rate over 5, rather than using 5 as an average.
Ofcourse Im speculating, because they really do seem stiff. But theyre a good price, and the guy who makes them is a good bloke. They do their job.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Kmac springs, any good?
|
doosra | Thu, 02 December 2004 21:50 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
bathurst-91 | Thu, 02 December 2004 22:16 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
Nark | Thu, 02 December 2004 22:24 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
doosra | Thu, 02 December 2004 22:23 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
bathurst-91 | Thu, 02 December 2004 22:45 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
doosra | Thu, 02 December 2004 22:50 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
4agte | Fri, 03 December 2004 00:16 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
bathurst-91 | Fri, 03 December 2004 02:13 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
doosra | Fri, 03 December 2004 02:18 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
greenta22 | Fri, 03 December 2004 05:16 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
ae86drift | Fri, 03 December 2004 05:54 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
river | Fri, 03 December 2004 06:07 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
CLG | Fri, 03 December 2004 07:26 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
spirokeet | Fri, 03 December 2004 14:09 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
doosra | Sat, 04 December 2004 16:18 |
|
Re: Kmac springs, any good?
|
greenta22 | Sun, 05 December 2004 05:05 |
