| Author | Topic |
|---|
I supported Toymods
Banned User
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: radar question
|
Mon, 06 December 2004 13:52
 
|
 |
| 4agte wrote on Mon, 06 December 2004 23:39 |
to answer ur first post they might not in qld but i can assure u this cop was very pisse at me it was not like he was gonna let me off they have to show u the reading otherwise i guarantee u it wont stand up in court when they are standing in the box and my barraster is asking them why they couldnt show me the reading the judge will want to know why they couldnt aswell if they were so called telling the truth. If the police car has no way of telling your speed then how do they know ur speeding??
About ur second post i spent alot of time researching radar detectors and the like and came across a guy who was an ex highway patrol officer in the states who now tests radar detectors. He was giving a demonstration of the same radar gun as used in the nsw police force i think it was either hawk or something of the same it was a while ago.
He said that the radar needed to be at 15 degrees to the road to provide an accurate reading
|
Ok this is where I state that I am one of very few that setup radar and laser units in mobile cars through out Australia. As I said its been over 2 years since the police have had to show speed readings.
All the new high way cars I fit out have 3 cameras fitted. One on the C pillar facing the rear, one on the dashing facing the speedo and one on the A pillar facing forward. All three cameras are being recorded. The idea of this is so when a car goes speeding past the unmarked cop car, the video of the speedo will show the speeding car is obviously speeding. Again this is in all states. Yes even in NSW. These new cars are the reason the laws were changed as there no way to show what speed the offender was doing, but it does show dangerous driving.
As for your incorrect information on handheld radars, I think your a little confused with handheld lasers. Handheld lasers have to be pointed in a tight angle at the number plate and not at the windscreen like people think. Pointing a laser at the windscreen can allow the light to penetrate and bounce off the side window giving two reflected beams giving an incorrect reading. All handheld radars in use today are fool proof and dont need to be held in any special way at all.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
radar question
|
Powderfinger | Sun, 05 December 2004 08:44 |
|
Re: radar question
|
thechuckster | Sun, 05 December 2004 08:47 |
|
Re: radar question
|
boris | Sun, 05 December 2004 08:48 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Powderfinger | Sun, 05 December 2004 09:41 |
|
Re: radar question
|
negative boost | Sun, 05 December 2004 10:51 |
|
Re: radar question
|
EVOSTi | Sun, 05 December 2004 11:02 |
|
Re: radar question
|
clubagreenie | Sun, 05 December 2004 11:17 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Cool1 | Sun, 05 December 2004 11:28 |
|
Re: radar question
|
clubagreenie | Sun, 05 December 2004 11:49 |
|
Re: radar question
|
4agte | Mon, 06 December 2004 13:20 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Cool1 | Mon, 06 December 2004 13:27 |
|
Re: radar question
|
AE86slut | Sun, 05 December 2004 11:58 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Jorrs | Sun, 05 December 2004 12:58 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Dust | Sun, 05 December 2004 13:48 |
|
Re: radar question
|
thechuckster | Sun, 05 December 2004 13:53 |
|
Re: radar question
|
riceburna73 | Mon, 06 December 2004 02:29 |
|
Re: radar question
|
skit | Mon, 06 December 2004 04:28 |
|
Re: radar question
|
4agte | Mon, 06 December 2004 13:27 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Cool1 | Mon, 06 December 2004 13:31 |
|
Re: radar question
|
4agte | Mon, 06 December 2004 13:39 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Cool1 | Mon, 06 December 2004 13:52 |
|
Re: radar question
|
4agte | Mon, 06 December 2004 14:07 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Cool1 | Mon, 06 December 2004 21:51 |
|
Re: radar question
|
RobST162 | Sun, 05 December 2004 13:54 |
|
Re: radar question
|
skit | Sun, 05 December 2004 23:25 |
|
Re: radar question
|
RobST162 | Sun, 05 December 2004 23:31 |
|
Re: radar question
|
dimmy77_03 | Mon, 06 December 2004 04:36 |
|
Re: radar question
|
riceburna73 | Mon, 06 December 2004 04:50 |
|
Re: radar question
|
dimmy77_03 | Mon, 06 December 2004 05:06 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Toobs | Mon, 06 December 2004 07:05 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Cool1 | Mon, 06 December 2004 09:18 |
|
Re: radar question
|
AE86slut | Mon, 06 December 2004 09:26 |
|
Re: radar question
|
EVOSTi | Mon, 06 December 2004 10:31 |
|
Re: radar question
|
joorsh | Mon, 06 December 2004 12:48 |
|
Re: radar question
|
serge | Mon, 06 December 2004 13:01 |
|
Re: radar question
|
4agte | Mon, 06 December 2004 14:12 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Cool1 | Mon, 06 December 2004 21:54 |
|
Re: radar question
|
inertia | Mon, 06 December 2004 23:13 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Cool1 | Tue, 07 December 2004 00:26 |
|
Re: radar question
|
RobST162 | Tue, 07 December 2004 01:03 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Cool1 | Tue, 07 December 2004 01:34 |
|
Re: radar question
|
RobST162 | Tue, 07 December 2004 01:37 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Cool1 | Tue, 07 December 2004 01:44 |
|
Re: radar question
|
RobST162 | Tue, 07 December 2004 01:45 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Toobs | Tue, 07 December 2004 01:48 |
|
Re: radar question
|
RobST162 | Tue, 07 December 2004 01:53 |
|
Re: radar question
|
drift86levin | Tue, 07 December 2004 02:45 |
|
Re: radar question
|
Toobs | Tue, 07 December 2004 03:47 |
|
Re: radar question
|
dimmy77_03 | Tue, 07 December 2004 07:56 |
|
Re: radar question
|
toof | Tue, 07 December 2004 08:37 |
