| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Adelaide
Registered:
May 2003
|
|
Re: sales feedback
|
Mon, 06 December 2004 20:56
 
|
 |
The problem with this is that it opens up to a lot of libel claims. The Vendor Verdicts subforum on another site was closed due to a libel claim made by a private seller there.
Very much not a good idea. The idea in sigs is possible, because it means that the content is 100% the posters, and it is non moderateable. I.e. the moderators cannot change it, so there is no libel issue with the mods/board. If the verdicts do become moderatable then there is a big scope for libel issues.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
sales feedback
|
4DaDrift | Thu, 02 December 2004 13:29 |
|
Re: sales feedback
|
Dust | Fri, 03 December 2004 07:12 |
|
Re: sales feedback
|
thechuckster | Fri, 03 December 2004 12:14 |
|
Re: sales feedback
|
matt_84 | Fri, 03 December 2004 14:05 |
|
Re: sales feedback
|
4DaDrift | Fri, 03 December 2004 16:19 |
|
Re: sales feedback
|
takai | Mon, 06 December 2004 20:56 |
|
Re: sales feedback
|
Dust | Tue, 07 December 2004 11:49 |
|
Re: sales feedback
|
THE WITZL | Fri, 10 December 2004 08:54 |
|
Re: sales feedback
|
Dust | Fri, 10 December 2004 11:34 |
